+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 70

Thread: TT intake on an NA Supra anyone????

  1. #1
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    323

    TT intake on an NA Supra anyone????

    as the title states has anyone done this? i mean installed an TT intake on an NA Supra? (not for forced induction.....just to run the NA system this way)
    there may not be any advantages from this setup besides a unique look and the fact that you could change easier the spark plugs
    so is it possible to do this??? i have a 350Z airbox laying around at home and was wondering what to do with this thing

    if it's possible here's a plan on what to do:
    - change the position of the battery from driver side to passenger
    - use an 350Z airbox (because i want the stock look )
    - install TT cam covers
    - and of course get this thing running

    as for the fabrication it shouldn't be too hard to do
    as for the running setup.....do you guys think this setup could require a stand alone???

  2. #2
    SupraForums Member cyberBird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,628
    Is the search function broken? This exact topic has been covered probably hundreds of times already.

    The placement of the intake ports on the TT head is slightly different than the na, meaning the TT intake manifold will not bolt directly onto the head. A few people have tried to cut and splice TT and na lower runners so that the TT upper intake manifold bolts on, but all the examples I've seen leave the intake sitting very high and towards the right and the port matching is still a nightmare. All in all it can be done if you have decent fabrication skills, but I think an aftermarket intake manifold looks cleaner.

    Also, I don't think a standalone would be necessary as long as all the stock sensors, maf, and iacv remained in place on the new manifold.
    1995 67mm na-t hardtop

  3. #3
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    323
    i know that this was covered a hundred times andi knew that this would pop up i don't mean running this setup on an NA-T.......i mean on an NA car wihtout a turbo.
    of course i know that the TT head is slightly different from the NA head...i should have written that i'm looking into one of those NA aftermarket turbo intakes not the oem one!!!

  4. #4
    SupraForums Member romir123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Miami Fl.
    Posts
    468
    Put that nissan engine too and please leave this forum
    ASE master tech L 1 advanced engine performance / Toyota master tech / Honda gold level tech


    Our supras, who art in the driveway, hallowed be thy name, thy speed has come, thy will never be done, on the road as it is on the mind, give us this day your daily beauty, and forgive us our speeding, as we forgive those who drive slow, and lead us not into incarceration, but deliver us from the five-o ....amen

    A beautiful Supra Prayer by: Kris Paczedlik

  5. #5
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    323
    lol so funny....what's the problem??? don't reply if you have nothing usefull to say

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    57
    hi!

    there's no use in swapping the NA intake and still stay NA.
    The NA intake was designed this way for a certain purpose - produce power on the NA version of the 2JZ engine....
    With the TT style intake you would loose some torque most probably when staying NA - That's what I read on the british forums.

    regards, Herbert

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Not Canada
    Age
    27
    Posts
    3,633
    jfc, what the fuck is going on with this forum?

  8. #8
    From the land down under Mr Ree NZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, 6023
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,191
    Besides the fact that this forum has atleast 1,000,000 threads about this topic...

    Fitting an FFIM to an NA will make your car ALOT slower so unless its just a show car, then its a waste of time and money.
    1996.8 JDM SZ JZA80 NA-T 310RWKW

  9. #9
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    235
    yeah you will loose a bunch of torque, and if you are seen with a FFIM on your n/a people will instantaneously poke fun at you.

    1995 SC300 5spd Na-T (Boosted Daily)

  10. #10
    SupraForums Member gfallon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Brandon, MS
    Age
    36
    Posts
    538
    xm 1
    i am having a long runner ffim custom made for my supra at this moment. not sure how it will perform, but was curious so i said what the hell lets find out.
    95 Supra n/a:
    Injen cold air, Exerd headers, ttc 268 cams, aem ems, JUN cam gears, Kazz LSD
    TRD strut brace, TMS sway bars, mid pipe, JIC Ti catback,
    Sparco evo seat, Sparco harness bar, Takata harness
    1988 Z24 (autox)
    2000 F-150 (work)
    1988 FC turbo II (project car)

  11. #11
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    235
    It will end up being slower, the stock intake manifold is the best you can run on an n/a.
    If you want more n/a power, you can change the stock throttle body for one from an ls400. if you are vvti use the ls430 one.
    doing this and deleting the egr pipe will eliminate the restrictions that are in the intake system, which is already very efficient.
    looks like this http://www.clublexus.com/forums/perf...-body-mod.html
    Last edited by Ali_SC3; 12-16-2011 at 11:05 PM.

  12. #12
    SupraForums Member romir123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Miami Fl.
    Posts
    468
    Also put an interfooler
    thats an intercooler on a n/a lmao

  13. #13
    SupraForums Member HotSoup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    North Carolina
    Age
    34
    Posts
    7,609
    Quote Originally Posted by romir123 View Post
    Also put an interfooler
    thats an intercooler on a n/a lmao
    How about an intercooler with a filter on the end, would that be a filtercooler?
    1994 Red/Black TT Auto
    86K miles
    Blown Up :(

  14. #14
    SupraForums Member fredriksolem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Trondheim, Norway
    Posts
    1,176
    You can go without the intake! it will be superfast this way!
    1993 N/A-T - TOTAL REBUILT ENGINE - VRP76DBB - 2X AN8 FEED - AN8 RETURN - AN12 FUEL RAIL- ID1600 INJECTORS - ELECTROMOTIVE TEC GT EMS -MISHIMOTO - DAVEH INTAKE - 4" BL DP, 4" BL EXHAUST ++++

  15. #15
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    235
    maybe a filterfooler?

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Not Canada
    Age
    27
    Posts
    3,633
    Op can kill himself. Then the car will run 9's.

  17. #17
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    152
    xm 1,

    I posted a few pics of my 2JZ build, which is nearly complete. As you can see, it has the dreaded FFIM on it which will accept an 80mm TB. The car is nearly complete afterwhich time I will log some dyno time for tuning. Given that I was able to squeeze 193 RWHP out of my old 5MGE, I am expecting around 250 RWHP on this motor...

    Gfallon, I am looking forward to seeing that Intake...

    Regards,

    Carlos








  18. #18

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    57
    @ Carlos: this is a really great built! do you have a certain thread about that here on the forum?

    regards, Herbert

  19. #19
    SupraForums Member gfallon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Brandon, MS
    Age
    36
    Posts
    538
    Carlos Brown, that engine looks sweet! my intake is not as extreme as yours, i will be using the tt throttle body. here is a pick of mine, but i have not received it yet. last time i was on a dyno i did 220whp @7,500rpm this was on a mustang dyno

    also how did you finish your valve covers, and what color? mine look like shit
    Attached Images

  20. #20
    Last NA Driver FLZ_Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    So.Cal
    Age
    37
    Posts
    3,286
    Love your build Carlos.
    2012 Toyota Sienna LE 2.7L 6AT (w/Convience Package + Preferred Package)
    2000 Ford Fucus ZX3 5MT (I want my MPG! American Style.)
    1994 Toyota Supra 5MT (SZ-R Project Status: Retired, 2012 Speed Ventures Time Trial CC9 Champion)
    Road Racing Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/FLZBoy
    World's First Naturally Aspirated MKIV on E85: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=h38jB0hSInw



    Quote Originally Posted by johno86 View Post
    Sheldon has no competition.

  21. #21
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    152
    Gentlemen,

    I do not currently have a build thread on the forum since NA motors are not very popular around here. My valve covers are powder coated with a "Super Chrome" color. At some point I will add a few more details about the build, most likely when I have completed it.

    As you can see it has no distributor. I am running an SDS stand-alone computer with GM coil packs. I set my Unorthodox cam gears aside and am using the JUN gears that I purchased from Gfallon. Quite a bit going on here!

    As I stated, I am looking for 250 RWHP+ after this build is completed...

    Regards,

    Carlos

  22. #22

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Sydney Australia, NSW SUPRA CLUB
    Posts
    12
    looks a hundred times cleaner with TT covers and a FFIM
    The FSM black szr supra had a FFIM but it was a plenum for ITBs
    2001 RSP JZA80 Toyota Supra

  23. #23
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    152
    KLLM,

    Quote Originally Posted by KLEM View Post
    The FSM black szr supra had a FFIM but it was a plenum for ITBs
    True! This was one of my considerations for this Intake. It has equal length runners, such as ITB's, just without the throttle plates.... So, if ITB's can be utilized with a similar plenum, why not something of this sort? I will certainly provide dyno sheets once I start tuning... It would be nice if we had OEM trim dyno sheets to compare to. Then we would have first hand proof of the differences between the OEM NA and FFIM differences...

    Regards,

    Carlos

  24. #24
    SupraForums Member cyberBird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,628
    Quote Originally Posted by Carlos Brown View Post
    True! This was one of my considerations for this Intake. It has equal length runners, such as ITB's, just without the throttle plates.... So, if ITB's can be utilized with a similar plenum, why not something of this sort? I will certainly provide dyno sheets once I start tuning... It would be nice if we had OEM trim dyno sheets to compare to. Then we would have first hand proof of the differences between the OEM NA and FFIM differences...
    Is the bottom end built? Also, What hg and cams are you running?

  25. #25
    SupraForums Member gfallon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Brandon, MS
    Age
    36
    Posts
    538
    i have one dyno sheet but it is before i built my head. unfortunately i do not have a print out from when i had the aem tuned.
    i do have a gtech performance meter, i dont think it is going to give an accurate measure of hp but it will be good for compering before and after. which i will do

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 93.5 supra intake
    By harmonsandhu in forum MKIV (1993-1998)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-31-2011, 10:11 AM
  2. 89 Supra Intake
    By SupraMan1989 in forum MKIII (1986.5-1992)
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 10-12-2005, 12:29 PM
  3. intake for supra
    By TL211 in forum MKIV (1993-1998)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-24-2003, 10:39 AM
  4. Intake for supra MKIII
    By SupraSpeedBWU in forum MKIII (1986.5-1992)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-12-2002, 10:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts