+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 51 to 70 of 70

Thread: TT intake on an NA Supra anyone????

  1. #51
    SupraForums Member gfallon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Brandon, MS
    Age
    36
    Posts
    540
    i would get a 1j before i put that in my supra
    95 Supra n/a:
    Injen cold air, Exerd headers, ttc 268 cams, aem ems, JUN cam gears, Kazz LSD
    TRD strut brace, TMS sway bars, mid pipe, JIC Ti catback,
    Sparco evo seat, Sparco harness bar, Takata harness
    1988 Z24 (autox)
    2000 F-150 (work)
    1988 FC turbo II (project car)

  2. #52
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by gfallon View Post
    i would get a 1j before i put that in my supra
    +1

  3. #53
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    337
    talking about the intake guys

  4. #54
    SupraForums Member gfallon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Brandon, MS
    Age
    36
    Posts
    540
    i got my intake in today!
    but he put the n/a throttle body flange on it, not the tt like i wanted. this is were my laziness comes into play, i just assumed the tt was larger because it is larger at the front (tt has a 3 inch mouth). so i can get a 1uz from a friend for free (70mm) or i can save up and get an 80mm from the intake guy latter (just run the n/a for now) what are your thoughts?
    also i will be at Huston this week and will try to get on the dyno. so i will have a before and after dyno, just not sure when i will be able to get back to dyno after

  5. #55
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    152
    Gfallon,

    So you are telling me that the TT throttle body is a larger diameter than the NA throttle body? Are you sure? The NA TB is ~65mm, if memory serves me correct. I have never seen specs on the TT TB, however... As far as the flange goes, you can always open it up to match the desired gasket or ID...

    That 1UZ TB is huge - I would work on something smaller...

    Regards,

    Carlos

  6. #56
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    251
    While I agree that a tt intake on na would look cooler and avoid the headache of removing the whole damn na intake to change out spark plugs and injectors I dont know if it is really worth it. Some guys say you actually lose some low end torque and gain high end. I think the easier route would just go with an aftermarket intake that will be a direct fit instead of the whole hassle of modification. But if you dead set on it I say go for it.

    1993 supra 2jzgte vvti in progress
    build thread http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...-1993-MK4-NA-t

  7. #57

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by Carlos Brown View Post
    xm 1,

    I posted a few pics of my 2JZ build, which is nearly complete. As you can see, it has the dreaded FFIM on it which will accept an 80mm TB. The car is nearly complete afterwhich time I will log some dyno time for tuning. Given that I was able to squeeze 193 RWHP out of my old 5MGE, I am expecting around 250 RWHP on this motor...

    Gfallon, I am looking forward to seeing that Intake...

    Regards,

    Carlos









    Hi Carlos!

    It's been some time since you posted that pics on here.
    Just wanted to ask if there's any news on your built 2JZ-GE?
    As I'm a big fan of the normally aspirated 2JZ I'd be very interested in some news on this...

    best regards and greetings from europe,

    Herbert

  8. #58
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    337
    +1000000000000000 on updates

  9. #59
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    152
    Gentlemen,

    The car is pretty much done, I have just been waiting on a set of cooling fans and a shroud. I think the stand-alone is pretty well wired up as well... However, since I have been waiting on that one critical piece, I kind of put it on the back burner for the moment. The supplier contacted me several days ago and said that they should be back on track with stock very soon, though...

    I will update with some pics then!

    Regards,

    Carlos

  10. #60
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    337
    keep us updated carlos

    btw. does anyone know what that butterfly valve in the oem intake is good for????or let's keep it this way when does it close itself?? at low or high rpm?

  11. #61
    From the land down under Mr Ree NZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, 6023
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,253
    Its good for changing the characteristics of the intake airflow.

    From my underatanding, it is closed at high revs, and open at low revs
    1996.8 JDM SZ JZA80 NA-T 310RWKW

  12. #62
    SupraForums Member gfallon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Brandon, MS
    Age
    36
    Posts
    540
    nope its closed at low rpm, to create longer runners giving better power down low. it opens at 4,000 rpm, making a larger volume plenum and better power up top.
    not sure how much power. but i can break out the g-tech and see what it shows as the difference

  13. #63
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    337
    i personally think this could be the holy grail for the NA guys a new intake....so where are such companies like HKS, JUN, Tomei or even Cosworth?????? this could be a top seller!!!! i would def. buy one!!!!!!

  14. #64
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    337
    i already thought about building an intake which uses 2 throttle bodies....one for 3 cylinders. not sure if this could be a good solution, but comes closer to the ITB's than anything else. f++k europe....if i only lived in the US i already had my ITB's on!!!!!!!!!

  15. #65
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    353
    I tried going the TT FFIM and NA head route but its a headache. From my readings the only FFIM that could work because of the port designs is the JDM TT FFIM....I could be wrong. I ended up going with XS FFIM which is still brand new in box and now decided to change direction on the project lol. So if anyone wants the bolt on FFIM that XS offers shoot me a pm.

    I need to make up my mind on what direction im heading in with this project.

  16. #66
    From the land down under Mr Ree NZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, 6023
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,253
    The best direction to take would be as far away from xspower parts as possible.

  17. #67

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    62
    Yes pics would be great

    Quote Originally Posted by Carlos Brown View Post
    Gentlemen,

    The car is pretty much done, I have just been waiting on a set of cooling fans and a shroud. I think the stand-alone is pretty well wired up as well... However, since I have been waiting on that one critical piece, I kind of put it on the back burner for the moment. The supplier contacted me several days ago and said that they should be back on track with stock very soon, though...

    I will update with some pics then!

    Regards,

    Carlos

  18. #68
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    353
    The XS power FFIM is not a bad design at all especially if you weld in the lower runners instead of bolting them in.....granted it is by now way even close to the custom FFIM you see above or those which are $1000+...but for a low budget price it was a decent bargain.

    Very nice FFIM above and I too would like to see that project finished.

  19. #69
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    243
    Quote Originally Posted by xm 1 View Post
    i personally think this could be the holy grail for the NA guys a new intake....so where are such companies like HKS, JUN, Tomei or even Cosworth?????? this could be a top seller!!!! i would def. buy one!!!!!!
    Never happen!!! They have all done their research and know that they can't substantially improve on the OEM part. The varyable volume plenum not only improves low end torque by having a smaller volume it also isolates each induction pulse. Every large volume FFIM I have seen would be a loss on an NA. Runners are too short, plenum volume too large, cylinder to cylinder induction robbing and varying airflow across the runners. Of course if you are revving the engine to 9000+rpm and don't care about driveability or have a big boost NA-t disregard what I have said.

  20. #70
    SupraForums Member kiro1968@yahoo.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Behindyou
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by 2muchboost View Post
    I tried going the TT FFIM and NA head route but its a headache. From my readings the only FFIM that could work because of the port designs is the JDM TT FFIM....I could be wrong......
    Does not fit, Aristo 2jzgte upper intake manifold does not fit on the USDM 2jzge lower intake runner. Port spacing/pattern does not match, bolt locations does not match either. Aristo 2jzgte upper intake manifold is slightly shorter vs the USDM 2jzge upper intake manifold.

    Yes I know this to be true since I have an Aristo 2jzgte upper intake manifold sitting in the garage and yes I tested on my USDM 2jzge that is sitting on a pallet in the back yard.

    ^_^
    1993 Toyota Supra Black NA 5spd -> TT Engine Swap 5spd

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Similar Threads

  1. 93.5 supra intake
    By harmonsandhu in forum MKIV (1993-1998)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-31-2011, 10:11 AM
  2. 89 Supra Intake
    By SupraMan1989 in forum MKIII (1986.5-1992)
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 10-12-2005, 12:29 PM
  3. intake for supra
    By TL211 in forum MKIV (1993-1998)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-24-2003, 10:39 AM
  4. Intake for supra MKIII
    By SupraSpeedBWU in forum MKIII (1986.5-1992)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-12-2002, 10:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts