+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 85

Thread: New precision 6466

  1. #26

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Vegas
    Posts
    83
    Curious, was this with divided or un-divided housings? What AR?

    Craigs manifold is divided, correct?
    I'm about to order one of these, but can't decide between a .81 un-divided or a 1.00 divided housing. I have a T4 divided manifold...

  2. #27
    SupraForums Member K_SHAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    boise, idaho
    Posts
    1,223
    ditto
    Creator of Power, Destroyer of the Average.

    89 JZA70 The Silver Bullet << click me! 2JZ-gte Swapped Billet 7175 ,ID2000's, Twin Disk ORC, JE Pistons, Eagle Rods, CF driveshaft, Volks TE37's, Chasebays Engine Harness, Stance GR+, More..
    Check Out Our Facebook Page.. www.facebook.com/TruePerformance

  3. #28
    Where is my 2JZ Hukhuksupra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Soaring through Canada on my Eagle rods
    Posts
    1,618
    Craig has an HKS divided manifold. This turbo makes killer power for the size.
    The 81a/r seems like it works the best out of all the housings according to SP.
    Mr. pump and meth
    74billet 1.00a/r
    962rwhp@35psi with pump/meth
    1010rwhp@38psi race gas

  4. #29
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Waynesville, MO
    Age
    41
    Posts
    3,914
    ^^^ correct!

    fwiw, i would get the divided housing so that if you ever want to swap your manifold for an undivided and then use the QSV, you've already got the housing. but i don't see availability being a big deal, so you could always swap the manifold AND housing later if you want. 6 of one, half dozen of the other really.


    craig
    Government cannot give anything to anybody that it doesn't first take from somebody else. Whenever somebody receives something without working for it, somebody else has to work for it without receiving. The worst thing that can happen to a nation is for half of the people to get the idea they don't have to work because somebody else will work for them, and the other half to get the idea that it does no good to work because they don't get to enjoy the fruits of their labor.
    - Adrian Rogers

  5. #30
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    114
    Turbo made 950 on a Evo with a 2.0 at 50lbs Very Impressive

  6. #31
    HKS T51R SupraTTR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Young America
    Posts
    855
    Good thing I didn't jump on a turbo yet!

  7. #32
    desufnoC myMUSICveins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Lost
    Posts
    1,832
    Would these turbos behave differently at pump gas levels or the same spread of power should be expected? Also does it make any sense to use a QSV even if going with a cast manifold, or are those only ideal for a divided tubular mani?

    | K&N Drop-In | RMM DP | HKS Super Dragger |
    | HKS Hardpipes | XZ-S MBC @ 16psi | GReddy Boost Gauge |
    | GReddy FCD |


  8. #33
    TACO! nomolos1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Lawrenceville, Ga
    Age
    41
    Posts
    715
    I have the 6766. It will be sitting on a non-divided manifold. What AR are on these turbos. I have a .81 for a quick spool. I know I'll need a different one for more top end hp. But I'm looking for something that will get me down the track fast with out the use of NOS.
    Last edited by nomolos1; 06-03-2012 at 05:20 AM.
    94 T Auto 1 0f 549 (wife's)
    93 T 6spd 1 of 197 (Mine) "can't let her have all the fun"

  9. #34
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Highlands Ranch CO
    Posts
    589
    Quote Originally Posted by myMUSICveins View Post
    Would these turbos behave differently at pump gas levels or the same spread of power should be expected? Also does it make any sense to use a QSV even if going with a cast manifold, or are those only ideal for a divided tubular mani?
    SP is selling the QSV as an option on the Torque monster cast mani kit, so that must make sense.

    I'd also like to know if lower boost/pump gas build still favors a 6466 over a 6266, or not so much?

    1998 QS 6MT; white-glove BPU; 5/06 - current
    1994 Alpine 6MT 414rwhp; 5/99 - 11/03
    BCC Tech: http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/bcc.../bcc_intro.htm

  10. #35
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    139
    Great info

  11. #36
    SupraForums Member K_SHAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    boise, idaho
    Posts
    1,223
    Rb26
    - Carillo rods
    - CP pistons
    - stock head port wise
    - Tomei Pon B cams
    - 9.5:1 compression
    - ID2000's
    - Raw Brokerage Intake mani (pile of shit)
    - FullRace divided mani with twin tial 38's
    - 6466 w/ divided 1.00 housing
    - 4inch Custom exhaust made in house
    - more..



    The motor was meant for the R33 GTr I have been building. PACNW nationals came and the owner bought a r34 that had a mishap on the dyno.. we worked for 48hrs to get the new motor in for a show.. (you can see the results of rush) Car hasn't been fired up yet, we are redoing alot of things and Cleaning it all up..

    Numbers should come in the next month or so.
    Last edited by K_SHAN; 09-10-2012 at 07:15 PM.

  12. #37
    SupraForums Member Supraofthecorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    South of Chicago
    Posts
    274
    I will post my graph or have Reid post it after SP F1 manifold qsv valve with the 1.0 divided 6466 are installed in Oct

  13. #38
    SupraForums Member Yogujuhere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    606
    Quote Originally Posted by Supraofthecorn View Post
    I will post my graph or have Reid post it after SP F1 manifold qsv valve with the 1.0 divided 6466 are installed in Oct
    Hey, did you dyno your setup yet? Any feedback on your street driving? Curious to see how you like the 6466 w/qsv on a tubular manifold with a 1.00. Pretty much how I'm considering moving mine towards, but with a 10:1 comp ratio and a hypertune
    Last edited by Yogujuhere; 11-08-2012 at 08:57 AM.

  14. #39
    Was 9sec STOCK motor 6spd Reid@SP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Dekalb, IL
    Age
    24
    Posts
    6,340
    Quote Originally Posted by Yogujuhere View Post
    Hey, did you dyno your setup yet? Any feedback on your street driving? Curious to see how you like the 6466 w/qsv on a tubular manifold with a 1.00. Pretty much how I'm considering moving mine towards, but with a 10:1 comp ratio and a hypertune
    We're a bit behind at the shop so Neal's setup hasn't been finished yet. I'm definitely looking forward to the results!

  15. #40
    SupraForums Member Yogujuhere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    606
    Quote Originally Posted by Reid@SP View Post
    We're a bit behind at the shop so Neal's setup hasn't been finished yet. I'm definitely looking forward to the results!
    Awesome, thanks Reid for the response. Have you guys done a 6466 on a QSV yet with a tubular manifold?

  16. #41
    SupraForums Member K_SHAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    boise, idaho
    Posts
    1,223
    6466 with that housing and Qsv.. Thats gonna be a very interesting setup lol


    *updates on the r34.* Fab'd new Ic piping and few other things.. Just waiting on John reeds patch harness for the Motec.

  17. #42
    www.spracingonline.com Sound Performance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Well, Dick, here's the deal: I'm the best there is, plain and simple. I mean, I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence. You know, nobody can hang with my stuff.
    Age
    47
    Posts
    10,904
    I just received word that a 6466 on a cast manifold on ProEFI and E85 made a tick over 900 rwhp on a dynojet in california!


    Sound Performance
    630-893-5002

    DO NOT PM ME!!!

    Email - XXSUPRAXX@AOL.COM
    Instant Messenger - XXSUPRAXX
    Text or Cell Phone - (630) 205-6690

  18. #43
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    NZ
    Age
    35
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by K_SHAN View Post
    Rb26
    - Carillo rods
    - CP pistons
    - stock head port wise
    - Tomei Pon B cams
    - 9.5:1 compression
    - ID2000's
    - Raw Brokerage Intake mani (pile of shit)
    - FullRace divided mani with twin tial 38's
    - 6466 w/ divided 1.00 housing
    - 4inch Custom exhaust made in house
    - more..



    The motor was meant for the R33 GTr I have been building. PACNW nationals came and the owner bought a r34 that had a mishap on the dyno.. we worked for 48hrs to get the new motor in for a show.. (you can see the results of rush) Car hasn't been fired up yet, we are redoing alot of things and Cleaning it all up..

    Numbers should come in the next month or so.
    Very keen to see how that goes!! Particularly interested in seeing how the higher compression RB26 combo works

  19. #44
    SupraForums Member K_SHAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    boise, idaho
    Posts
    1,223
    this is our very mild rb26..

    We are in the middle of a building another, Higher compression and alot more turbo, and 3.0l....

  20. #45
    SupraForums Member Yogujuhere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    606
    Quote Originally Posted by Sound Performance View Post
    I just received word that a 6466 on a cast manifold on ProEFI and E85 made a tick over 900 rwhp on a dynojet in california!
    In for more news!

  21. #46
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    long island
    Age
    25
    Posts
    844
    Quote Originally Posted by Sound Performance View Post
    Now look at this next dyno on Reid's car, the 64 out spooled the 67 and made more HP showing that when inits efficiency range it outperforms the 6766, not until we went all in like on Craig's car did the 67 make more HP.

    What were the turbine housing A/R for each of those turbos on Reid's car? We're they all the same? We're they all ball bearing?

    Thanks,
    Dan
    .
    Built 7M, T-70, Stinger 8860, SSv4, Built A340E, Big Stall, Water/Meth, Doward's Cobra Brakes And More Coming Soon.
    '89 Turbo Targa *Old time 13.8 @ 99.4* *New time ??.? @ ???.?MPH*
    Parting my Built 7M Ross Pistons on Eagle Rods, GM Trans Adaptor, ATI Damper and more, Click here for the thread.

  22. #47
    www.spracingonline.com Sound Performance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Well, Dick, here's the deal: I'm the best there is, plain and simple. I mean, I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence. You know, nobody can hang with my stuff.
    Age
    47
    Posts
    10,904
    .81 a/r. I think they were all bb not that it really makes a difference

  23. #48
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    long island
    Age
    25
    Posts
    844
    They were all .81?

    Yeah, im lookin at the boost curve thats why im asking about the ball bearing option.

    This is a sick dyno comparison, Thanks so much!!

  24. #49
    SupraForums Member GT_Ridaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Doha, Qatar
    Age
    33
    Posts
    615
    I mighht get one too
    Alex

    97 jdm Supra, Turbonetics T76, greddy FMIC, 4" exhaust, tripple disk HKS Clutch
    08 Nissan Petrol (Daily Driver)
    08 Range Rover (Supercharged)

  25. #50
    TACO! nomolos1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Lawrenceville, Ga
    Age
    41
    Posts
    715
    So in other words, the 6766 is a waste of money, if it can't make more HP than the 6466.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. FS- Precision 6765-1000cc precision injectors-r154 swap- misc stuff
    By Lost_Dalinkwent in forum NE: For Sale/Wanted
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-03-2012, 12:59 AM
  2. precision 67mm DBB VS. precision 6765 billet journal
    By PDuque19 in forum MKIV (1993-1998)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-07-2011, 07:46 AM
  3. Which Precision 67?
    By 93SupraTT in forum MKIV (1993-1998)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-28-2007, 02:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts