+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Thoughts on these $300 e-85 conversion kits

  1. #1
    That Guy.... Ask92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    On the computer
    Posts
    902

    Thoughts on these $300 e-85 conversion kits

    I would have put this in OT, but I want it to be a halfway decent thread.

    Someone recently sent me a link to this kit asking if this is the real deal or if it is just another electric supercharger type of thing. After looking into it a bit more it looks like it is just basically a box that changes the injectors duel cycle makes them work harder to pump more fuel in. It obviously wont be good for anyone looking to make serious power, but it may be a viable option for OEM guys to run e85 without shelling out the cash for a EMS. Anyone have any thoughts or experience with kits like these?

    http://www.ez85.us/home
    http://www.alcoholcanbeagas.com/stor...ion_kits_front
    Last edited by Ask92; 05-10-2012 at 01:42 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Reid@SP View Post
    If X happens, ProEFI fixes it. If Y happens, ProEFI fixes it. If Sean Connery starts talking about your mother and refers to you as Alex Trebek, ProEFI fixes it.

  2. #2
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    240
    This will only adjust fuel though, the main benefit of e85 is the increase in timing. There really is no benefit to e85 if your going to change nothing with the tune of the vehicle except injector duty. Its cheaper fuel but you use more per mile. Its like filling up a geo metro with race gas, it would do nothing, probably even run worse without adjustment to the timing, but you could tell your friends it runs on race gas.

  3. #3
    SupraForums Member slither's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    35
    Posts
    6,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Viggs View Post
    This will only adjust fuel though, the main benefit of e85 is the increase in timing. There really is no benefit to e85 if your going to change nothing with the tune of the vehicle except injector duty. Its cheaper fuel but you use more per mile. Its like filling up a geo metro with race gas, it would do nothing, probably even run worse without adjustment to the timing, but you could tell your friends it runs on race gas.
    I disagree respectfully. Guys running a stock Ecu already see more timing than most with an aftermarket Ecu(takes care of adding the timing) so really all the piggyback guys need is a way to add more fuel(although jacking fuel press is also a good way,, but not always enough)
    There's a ton more to it than that, but don't forget piggyback guys have been doing fuel only tuning for many many years and its still one of the best systems out there imo and Damn sure reliable
    AboveFab(supra fabrication)

    Feel free to text me with any questions/tech/advice/info. Its quicker and more personal than pms and you are sure to get a quick response. 434-470-2700

  4. #4
    ESE CULO RemixPinoY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    San Jose/Manteca/Livermore
    Age
    23
    Posts
    2,965
    e85 is about 30 percent worse in consumption compared to 91-93 pump right? Couldn't one say that the difference in price to 91 ocatane IE here in CA which is 4.30-45 a gallon atm be offset with the performance increase with the only flaw being more frequent fill ups? Basically they somewhat equal out in costs since last I checked E85 was around 3.50-3.75 a gallon. So couldn't you almost drive as far with the same amount of money being pumped in your car of e85 compared to 91 pump?
    No GIFs in signatures!

  5. #5
    SupraForums Member PedoBear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Fremont
    Posts
    2,327
    my e85 supra with 1200cc on piggy back runs like oem lol.... only draw back is when i reset the ecu it takes awhile for the ecu to relearn it self.
    Tuned by: LS Fabrication

  6. #6
    Blood for Blood RogueSupra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Diego Cali
    Age
    32
    Posts
    8,052
    Quote Originally Posted by RemixPinoY View Post
    e85 is about 30 percent worse in consumption compared to 91-93 pump right? Couldn't one say that the difference in price to 91 ocatane IE here in CA which is 4.30-45 a gallon atm be offset with the performance increase with the only flaw being more frequent fill ups? Basically they somewhat equal out in costs since last I checked E85 was around 3.50-3.75 a gallon. So couldn't you almost drive as far with the same amount of money being pumped in your car of e85 compared to 91 pump?
    In a word... NO.

    Your math, that you have not done is wrong.
    MKIV Parts for sale ....
    http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...-Greddy-intake



    If you can READ this thank a teacher. If its in ENGLISH thank a VETERAN.

  7. #7
    That Guy.... Ask92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    On the computer
    Posts
    902
    Quote Originally Posted by RemixPinoY View Post
    e85 is about 30 percent worse in consumption compared to 91-93 pump right? Couldn't one say that the difference in price to 91 ocatane IE here in CA which is 4.30-45 a gallon atm be offset with the performance increase with the only flaw being more frequent fill ups? Basically they somewhat equal out in costs since last I checked E85 was around 3.50-3.75 a gallon. So couldn't you almost drive as far with the same amount of money being pumped in your car of e85 compared to 91 pump?
    According to e85prices.com the average price is 3.66 for e85 and 4.23 for 87 according to californiagasprices.com. In 2000 miles if you average 25mpg on 87(not a supra obviously) you will use 80 gallons of fuel. 80x$4.23= $338.40. Same setup, you'll get 17.5mpg on E-85(-30%) and use 114.3 gallons of fuel. 114.3x$3.66=$418.28. So yes E-85 is more expensive overall, but for performance applications it is obviously much cheaper and more readily available than race gas.

    Obviously because Supras already have to run premium and generally have crap mpg the gap between the 2 will close a bit, but not much.

    Guys I don't want this to turn into e85 vs. Conventional gasoline thread , there are plenty of those already. I don't think people will be converting their everyday cars to e85 to run more boost, or to cut down costs but more to "Save the planet"(Yes I know e85 is very energy intensive). I was mainly looking for peoples overall thoughts on these kits and if anyone had any first hand experience with them
    Last edited by Ask92; 05-10-2012 at 07:50 PM.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    currently: CA
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by RemixPinoY View Post
    e85 is about 30 percent worse in consumption compared to 91-93 pump right? Couldn't one say that the difference in price to 91 ocatane IE here in CA which is 4.30-45 a gallon atm be offset with the performance increase with the only flaw being more frequent fill ups? Basically they somewhat equal out in costs since last I checked E85 was around 3.50-3.75 a gallon. So couldn't you almost drive as far with the same amount of money being pumped in your car of e85 compared to 91 pump?
    correct.

    let's say 4.3 / gallon 91 ... 50 bucks gives you 11.6 gallons
    let's assume 15 MPG ... 174 miles

    3.5 / gallon E85 ... 50 bucks gives you 14.3 gallons
    let's assume 30% worse MPG -> 11.5 MPG ... results in 164 miles


    Quote Originally Posted by RogueSupra View Post
    In a word... NO.

    Your math, that you have not done is wrong.

    WHAT? how about you do the math?

    80% of all your comments are either useless or simply wrong from what I've read.

  9. #9
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Houston
    Age
    28
    Posts
    737
    If your not into the technically eco friendly peace of mind. It is the best race gas you can put for 800whp not sure if I would go higher safety wise. E98 for anything more though I will just for kicks use Q16 when I am ready.

    To keep your parts lasting longer with E85. Fuel pumps, injectors, internals. If you plan on going on a 2 week vacation, or storing it your car for winter. Put 2 gallons of regular pump gas, or premium in a empty gas tank. Turn the car on, and let it idle for a couple of minutes to push the regular gas inside the engine preventing moisture damage from the E85. More tests needs to be done with oil, but I hear amsoil is the best for E85 with the same changing intervals. Custom build your own fuel kit to save money.

  10. #10
    Boost Junkie 1A1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Indiana
    Age
    39
    Posts
    8,367
    Blog Entries
    1
    We shouldn't be talking about E85 for fuel economy reasons, although I get about 10-15% less per mile during normal cruising than I did with pump fuel. The true benefit of E85 is that it performs better than C16 for a fraction of the cost and is readily available, at least here in the Midwest.

    Steve K.

    10.002@137.20MPH thru the MAF (auto, old set up)
    1993.5 Anthracite 6 SPD "Wingless" // PRO EFI // PTE6766 // 3-Row // E-85 Fuel Sys // PHR I/M // RPS C/C // GSC S1 // CCW C14 // TRD LSD

  11. #11
    SupraForums Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    591
    I just filled up last week, $2.99 here in Utah!
    97 DJG 6spd! Billet 7175/ AEM EMS/ CCW/


  12. #12
    Blood for Blood RogueSupra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Diego Cali
    Age
    32
    Posts
    8,052
    Quote Originally Posted by SupraHT View Post

    WHAT? how about you do the math?

    80% of all your comments are either useless or simply wrong from what I've read.
    ^ Go read all 7,060 posts again puss cake. The math is wrong because the units you are working in are not correct. Race gas vs E85 ... no one goes to E85 for the cheaper price over 91 and does not re tune the car and turn up the boost. You need to learn to read kid.

    Its all about E85 vs unleaded race fuel. If you wanted to do the math on this you need to find a few things out. Ethanol has about 115 octane and E85 has 105 octane depends on the mix and location you are in. Here in San Diego we get 105 E85 at the pump year round it will never change.

    Quote Originally Posted by 1A1 View Post
    We shouldn't be talking about E85 for fuel economy reasons, although I get about 10-15% less per mile during normal cruising than I did with pump fuel. The true benefit of E85 is that it performs better than C16 for a fraction of the cost and is readily available, at least here in the Midwest.

    Steve K.
    ^ bingo...

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    currently: CA
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by RogueSupra View Post
    ^ Go read all 7,060 posts again
    7059 of your 7060 post are bullshit - you really dont know what youre talking about. you NEED to learn to STFU!

  14. #14
    Blood for Blood RogueSupra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    San Diego Cali
    Age
    32
    Posts
    8,052
    ^ If you want to argue or fight with me PM me and I can delete it without reading it or come on over and meet me in person and we can see how tuff you really are. Do not clutter up with forums with your retarded aggression. Go take that crap out on someone else. You are off topic and killing this thread with your lame ass harassment attempts and retarded posts. If you can not contribute in a peaceful and productive manner I suggest you go fuck yourself.

    If a mod or admin feels my post above is out of line please feel free to delete it. I just do not think this member is being very peaceful or productive with his time spent on the forum harassing me and trying to pick some kind of an online fight.

    I vote to ban SupraHT.

  15. #15
    Im A Fuking Ninja!!! TonyN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tucson
    Posts
    4,328
    Quote Originally Posted by SupraHT View Post
    correct.

    let's say 4.3 / gallon 91 ... 50 bucks gives you 11.6 gallons
    let's assume 15 MPG ... 174 miles

    3.5 / gallon E85 ... 50 bucks gives you 14.3 gallons
    let's assume 30% worse MPG -> 11.5 MPG ... results in 164 miles





    WHAT? how about you do the math?

    80% of all your comments are either useless or simply wrong from what I've read.
    The point is E85 is not worth it in a cost saving perspective, after you figure out the cost of the compatable fuel lines, injectors, pump, EMS, and tune you are way way deep in the hole to save any money versus 91 pump. The benifit of E85 is when you take into consideration the cost of race fuel, the debate between E85/91 pump gas in regards to cost savings is a moot point.

    I myself use methanol and 91 pump, its cheap and does not require me to change out my whole fuel system.

    Take this to PM if you got a problem with certain members
    94 SP63, Auto 3.8k stall, meth/pump 91 = AKA Garage Anchor



    More pictures here: http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...yN-Version-2.0

    Condition Trumps Mileage: http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...dition+mileage

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Thoughts on the ETS NA-T Kit
    By fetish in forum Naturally Aspirated
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-08-2008, 04:41 PM
  2. LED conversion thoughts
    By Shlongor in forum MKIII (1986.5-1992)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-13-2006, 04:06 AM
  3. thoughts on peter farrels is300 turbo kit?
    By rom in forum Naturally Aspirated
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-26-2003, 09:14 AM
  4. Twinturbo conversion of a TT, your thoughts please
    By TomSid in forum MKIV Technical
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-25-2001, 05:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts