Supra Forums banner
1 - 13 of 13 Posts

·
Administrator
Joined
·
17,272 Posts
Be forwarned that Curt Aigner told me that none of the numbers we handily reference (either model by number or color by year) were actually released by Toyota as official figures.

Still, there is no denying that alpine silver HT TT's are among the rarest of the rare and 95 HT TT's are among the rarest of the rare. Put them together and you have one hell of a rare/desireable combination! :D

Steve T.
 

·
Old School
Joined
·
4,151 Posts
Steve Theodore said:
Be forwarned that Curt Aigner told me that none of the numbers we handily reference (either model by number or color by year) were actually released by Toyota as official figures.

Steve T.
I wish people would stop using them.

They were debunked a while back on the mailing list by a Toyota executive who couldn't get access to real production vs. color numbers.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,705 Posts
Lagtime said:
I wish people would stop using them.

They were debunked a while back on the mailing list by a Toyota executive who couldn't get access to real production vs. color numbers.


Is there any way we can get real production numbers nowadays so we can update that mkiv.com datasheet and have a reliable reference?

Curt? Help? :dunno:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,705 Posts
Steve Theodore said:
No, there isn't. I've asked Curt and he says no way.

Steve T.

so i guess there is no other choice except to
use the data from mkiv.com. Its our only source right now
to know a certain color combo is more rare and more
desireable. So be it.....


-P.B.
 

·
Old School
Joined
·
4,151 Posts
::MySTiK_[SuPRa]:: said:
so i guess there is no other choice except to
use the data from mkiv.com. Its our only source right now
to know a certain color combo is more rare and more
desireable. So be it.....


-P.B.
No. The correct choice when confronted with bad data is not to use it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,705 Posts
Lagtime said:
No. The correct choice when confronted with bad data is not to use it.

I don't think this is exactly "bad" data, but its more
like an approximate statistic, and thats what we should take
it as, nothing more. It does give us a "sense" of rarity as stated my Kreddy.



-Phu
 

·
The Sethster
Joined
·
971 Posts
i had a chance to get one in cali about 3 years ago for $ 9500 but it was salvage i didnt no how bad it was so i didnt buy it but it was a 94 or 95 im pretty sure:(
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top