Supra Forums banner
21 - 36 of 36 Posts

·
Smith & Wesson Member
Joined
·
657 Posts
Wow!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,297 Posts
MERC and Aston are not fooling around.

agreed - cars are crazy.


I'd personally take the Aston!

I think they're both cool. very different intentions though - the Aston is basically a track day toy (street legal LMP1-F1 hybrid replete with toes-at-eye-level seating position), while the Merc is a high-performance road car.
 

·
AfriCAN AmeriCANT
Joined
·
3,389 Posts
Aston has a track version of the Valkyrie. 25 will be made IIRC. I think he says it in the video above. The thing about the benz is that it looks like a need for speed version of the McLaren F1. Like they couldn't get the rights from McLaren so they made the closest thing they could to it. Valkyrie = spaceship!
 

·
I'm your huckleberry...
Joined
·
2,444 Posts
Discussion Starter · #27 ·
Aston Martin Valkyrie AMR Pro could exceed expectations
It isn’t out until 2020, but it appears the production version of the Valkyrie AMR Pro could have some rather impressive figures

  • Three versions of the Valkyrie will be built

Aston Martin’s track version of its Valkyrie hypercar, the AMR Pro, isn’t out until 2020, but it appears likely that the production version could end up being even more exciting than the official figures – including peak power of 1100bhp and a 1000kg weight with the same in downforce – have so far suggested.

Red Bull Racing’s Adrian Newey, who has led the car’s development alongside Aston creative director Marek Reichman, said: “The downforce we are quoting is obviously early days.


The model you see now is effectively the ideas that stand behind the project given over to Marek’s team to interpret. It will, of course, change quite a lot from that.” In other words, it could get even quicker.

Aston Martin Valkyrie could challenge for outright Nurburgring record

Newey also admitted that the Valkyrie came close to having a radically different engine from the chosen V12. “I spent a lot of time looking at different power units,” he said. “The obvious choices were a V6 – either single or twin-turbo – or a high-revving, naturally aspirated V12.


“In the end, I came to the conclusion that it should be the V12 because of what that allowed us to do in terms of structural mounting, because it’s a very well-balanced engine with good NVH characteristics. With a turbo, you need intercoolers; by the time you’ve put those on, the weight is fairly similar. Technically, the V12 was marginally superior, but it was a close call.”
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,297 Posts
Dayyuum. :bigthumb:
 

·
...pop the hood!
Joined
·
1,162 Posts
amazing...still looks super futuristic after all these years
 

·
I'm your huckleberry...
Joined
·
2,444 Posts
Discussion Starter · #34 ·
21 - 36 of 36 Posts
Top