[Sound Performance]

Any interest in a bolt on billet CEA turbo for the MKIII?? Would you rather have a billet 5857 capable of ~ 600 RWHP or a 6262 capable of close to 700.

 

[BlackDevilSupra]

Good idea for the turbo, bad idea for high HP option.
A bolt on turbo with moderate HP (<=500) capability is a sensible idea (SS did this). The stock manifold will become an extremely limited factor to any crazy high HP expectations, and therefore, not worth the effort.
JMHO

 

[Sound Performance]

I disagree. We have made well over 700 RWHP on a 2J with a cast manifold. With a little porting internally there is no reason to think that you cannot do this on a 7M. I know that we have done several bolt turbos on 7Ms making over 600 with a bone stock exhaust manifold.

 

[Alec]

Yes!!! I would love to see a 6262 or 6265 in bolt-on form! If you need a test car, I'm here

 

[chiguro]

I've got the First Generation of the Supra Sport Turbo Stage V BB Turbo...and in the progress of actually finishing my project soon....if for some reason I don't hit the 500wrhp....Yes...I would be interested.

But I do have concerns about the stock exhaust manifold limitations...?

 

[KevinM]

I disagree. We have made well over 700 RWHP on a 2J with a cast manifold. With a little porting internally there is no reason to think that you cannot do this on a 7M. I know that we have done several bolt turbos on 7Ms making over 600 with a bone stock exhaust manifold.

If I stick with the 7M I'd be interested. This year I'll be running a dynosaur 20g and if I stick with the 7M, quick-spooling, bolt-on turbo would definitely be the way to go.

My experience with an RPS header/GT4088, didn't result in a 'useable' powerband and I think a billet turbo with newer technology on a stock manifold would be worth a shot.

Kevin

 

[adidas00]

this will be very interesting, I'm currently running SupraSport bolt-on (1st gen.) ITS t67 turbo. Havn't tuned or dyno it yet but yes i do like this idea and will stay tuned.

 

[FullNelson]

Would you say these would be just as effective as their t4 counterpart?

 

[chiguro]

How about a Full Kit Turbo Kit utilizing the Quick Spool Valve as well?

 

[[email protected]]

Larry stole my idea...

 

[Alec]

Larry stole my idea...

I thought it was my idea.......

 

[SPJZA70]

I thought it was my idea.......

I thought of this years ago...............

 

[[email protected]]

I thought it was my idea.......

I thought of this years ago...............

You both stink.

 

[SpecialK]

Yes I'd be interested but in the smaller one. also depends on price

 

[USPtwins]

i don't mind a lil bit of lag for that huge pull.... thats y our 7m's are torquey

 

[MK3Brent]

If I stick with the 7M I'd be interested. This year I'll be running a dynosaur 20g and if I stick with the 7M, quick-spooling, bolt-on turbo would definitely be the way to go.

My experience with an RPS header/GT4088, didn't result in a 'useable' powerband and I think a billet turbo with newer technology on a stock manifold would be worth a shot.

Kevin

I disagree.
The 4088 on a T4 manifold was great on my 7M.
The car pulled great on the street, and occasionally brake boost would tear out on people so hard it was crazy.

As for the stock manifold, it's a complete waste of time and money.
There are bosses inside the casting from locating the external studs that could be machined/ported out... but why even bother.

 

[Alec]

Larry, get your MK3 running and prove em wrong!

 

[Acrux]

I'm just going to subscribe to this thread so i can see where it goes...

 

[Torque]

if i had a 7M i'll be all over this.

 

[[email protected]]

bump!