Supra Forums banner

My ProEFI experience

9.8K views 59 replies 23 participants last post by  imindirocz28  
#1 ·
So I wanted to take the time to share my thoughts on the Pro EFI. In a word... Awesome! I've had the unit for a little while working out some things with Jason so I haven't been able to spend much time tuning it.

Since I am stock TT ATM, we had to work on the ATM strategies and sequential software to suit my needs. Most of it is sorted out and I have to say the car has never driven as smooth as it has now. The trans goes into gear and shifts as smoothly as the stock ECU but hits the shift as hard as I want when I stand on it. I can talor any shift to have any feel I want. At low throttle I like a very light but positive shift. Almost imperceiveable but not mushy. I can make the trans do anything I want at any speed. One of the nicer things is slowing down you can't tell the trans is downshifting but if you get back in the throttle, it is already in the gear you want and doesn't have any delay getting into the demanded gear. The shift tables allow me to control the upshift and downshift to the exact speed I want per gear and TPS. Down to the hundreth of a MPH if I want.

The craziest thing is how UNREAL smooth and linear the sequential transition is. The first time I drove it with the software Jason wrote for Larry and me, I seriously thought the sequence wasn't working. I rolled into the throttle and the power came on with the first turbo like it always did but then kept increasing. I quickly realized the turbos switched over and I really didn't feel it! Keep in mind this was with some settings I ball parked knowing what I always wanted to do with the AEM but never had the control. I have maybe 5 minutes into the sequential calibration. During the drive I took a log sitting still at an idle going to WOT and up through 2nd gear. I sent it to Larry to see because I told him how good it was working. He emailed me back asking to send a log of the transition. I told him the 1.5 PSI drop as the turbos spooled was the transition. You can BARELY feel it when driving. It makes it SO much fun to drive.

Throttle response is fast and crisp. The car has never been this fun to drive. It transitions smoother than when it was stock on the OEM ECU with MUCH more power from the increased boost. Most of you know as you kick up the boost the transition gets worse. Back since 97 on the stock ECU I had dual boost controllers and modified bypass wastegate which drastically improved how it transitioned. It still wasn't close to how it is today. Since the timing control is very accurate, I could never get away with the timing numbers I am now or as aggressive on the A/Fs. The AEM timing floated around causing intermittent sensitivity to knock even on race fuel and limited potential power. On a stock TT car which is very knock sensitive this is critical. Another reason why the stock ECU with SAFC was such a killer combo over the AEM in a TT car. Now I can do what I want without having to be so cautious.

I took it to the track and on the first night (second run) the car ran 7.11 at 96mph in the 1/8th (1.500 60ft) which is in the top 3 passes for the car. I've run 7.0#s at 98mph before but on much better nights (cooler, cleaner air and 3 more PSI boost). We don't get the negative density altitude nights in CA with low humidity either. It was a 1200ft DA night when I made that pass. Granted I know the car well so I understood what the car needed but I seriously have about 15 min in the WOT tune. The shift RPM at 1-2 and 3-4 were 38 RPM apart!! I don't need to lead the shift as much with the ProEFI making it much more consistant to tune. I drove to the track, lowered tire pressure, pulled my headlight and put it on the track. First pass was a wash because the sequence worked so well it was at 22 psi boost within 1 sec from when I went WOT and blew off the tires. Next run I waited for the tree to start to drop before I got into it and launched at lower boost. Took it last thursday and only made one pass (lots of oil downs) and clicked a 7.23 with a mild 1.540 60ft on a much warmer night.

My set up:
FULL sequential. NOT in True Twin at the track or ever.
264 HKS cams
Intake w/ 6" AEM filter I fabricated (went just as quick MPH on stock airbox no filter)
Usually run with 1/2 to 3/4 tank (race gas) NOT VP import or Q16. Not any exotic fuel either.
Full weight (spare, jack, EVERYTHING in the car) with an extra 75lbs of tools, laptop/bag, and jumper/air pump/AC inverter box. Oh and my 200lb butt. Scales around 3850 with me in it when I race it.
Level 10 trans. No cooler, been in the car for 7yrs and has over 200 low 11 passes.
PI single disk converter built to my specifications. Not locked up.
275/45 R17 M/T DRs usually on stock wheels. Currently on Wedsports since my Toyo DR are on my stock rims. Wedsports are only about 3lbs lighter.
Stock front wheels. Which are 3.5" smaller diameter than CCW skinnies. Those who know, that is a HUGE difference in rollout and can be worth up to .2 in 1/4 alone...
Custom Penske 8300 shocks. Note they only helped with consistancy. Car did 1.48 60ft on completely stock 80k mi shocks/springs. Typically does 1.47-1.54 60fts with those shocks.
Rear alignment to my specs done by me in the garage with toe plates and old dunlop camber tool.
TRD diff and 4.27's. Didn't make big diff in E/T but really helped make the car hook better. Engine can't out accelrate the tires so if it spins it grabs sooner.
MSD DIS2/4. Unneccessary with ProEFI but had in the car since 97 (I had it working on stock ECU before Powerhouse ever did BTW...) Ha Ha!
RMM downpipe and Greddy twin path exhaust with stock chrome exhaust stack. That exhaust is VERY quiet and crazy heavy I might add.
HKS hardpipe kit painted black.
19 psi drops to 17 psi or so at high RPM. NOTE: Previous quickest/fastest passes on the car were with wastegate shimmed shut making 22 psi in 3rd gear

I think that is it...Everything else is 100% stock Toyota. Still has stock intercooler and 80k on original turbos. If not mentioned, its stock even the battery is Toyota True start...

The AEM that was in my car before had an easy 1000+ hours tinkering and drove better than any other AEM TT ATM car out there. I guarantee that. Anyone who knows me can back that up. Larry, Justin, Jason, Ryan H etc can attest to that statement. I used to install the converters in the car, put in pump gas and run it through CA Test Only stations every two years. No special favors or anything. EGR, EVAP all worked. It ran well. The ProEFI has almost NO time in the tune and blew the AEM out of the water. I haven't even bothered to put it in closed loop yet! I'm not bashing the AEM as it has been an excellent ECM I've trusted for years (and still will mind you) but times have changed and the bar has been raised.

When I talk drivability keep in mind that part of what I do for a living is evaluate drivability for an OEM (probably not hard to guess for whom...) I have my proving ground test track advanced licence and have driven on US and overseas test facilities in many capacities so I'm not just some random Supra owner. I cannot say how happy I am with this ECU. That is not enough for those involved and we all have been working to make it even better. I admit those involved had a bit of a learning curve and we had some challenges like any other product but Jason has been working very hard at improving it ever way he can. In the last week or so I feel the car is at a new level than it ever was before.

This ECU is a SERIOUS winner.
 
#5 ·
Dave, your giving away all my secrets:) Quit that, I need to keep my ace in the hole. Just tell all these people to buy that over priced Motec unit that helped Darin blow the shit out of his engine in texas:) Hahahaha, remember, he was the guy to beat:)
 
#7 ·
Hey! Keep it on subject there pally.... Don't blame the parts, blame the tuner. We've all made mistakes or got too over zealous on the dyno or track with catastrophic results. You know the Motec is an excellent ECU. Unfortunately quite a bit expensive to run everything on a TT ATM car like mine. Its not an option for me personally.

Pretty soon I want to have Guido drive my car to see the difference the ProEFI has made over the AEM. His car pretty much has the same set up as me running on an AEM (since I built and tuned his car) so he can experience how smoothly my car runs on the ProEFI. His "unique" driving style tends to bring forward any issues with hunting shift, idle instability, turbo transition etc. I'll be interested to see how he reacts to driving a car without the issues he had on the 1st gen AEM. Incidentally I currently have his car running on the Beta Gen 25 AEM so he will experience some preliminary differences between the 2 units.

Let me say at this point...
1) This thread is about the ProEFI NOT the new AEM
2) In fairness the AEM is NOT a finished product and should not be judged as such. Don't ask me a bunch of questions about details or opinions about it.

I will say each ECU has its pros and cons. They are very different ECUs in both software and hardware so it will be a case of simply matching the correct product to your needs.
 
#13 ·
Jess I'd ask you to please not be so sensitive... I don't know Darin or why he had a failure for that matter. I was defending him as I'm sure his motec had nothing to do with what happened. My point was simply if something breaks it is generally caused a mistake made by a builder/tuner, a part failure (either quality issue or stressed beyond design), or just crap luck. There was no malice in my statement.

I'd ask everyone to please stay on subject.

No thanks John! I've got a 8-5 job to deal with. 3yrs racing/traveling with a pro team while working killed that kind of life for me. Next time in CA come on by my house and I'll be happy to show you how it runs. I can ask the AEM guys to try and get one of the new units out to you pretty soon. They only have a few so they are hard to come by. Also.. honestly they need more time sorting out some stuff as they did quite a bit new software to go along with the new hardware so its probably okay to wait a bit more.
 
#18 ·
I'd ask everyone to please stay on subject.
Dave, you know it is too late for that.

Good info on the ProEFI. I'm happy with my V-pro, but it's nice to know about other options, should my needs end up changing at some point.
 
#15 ·
^ Im sure all the top race teams all around the world are just rushing to toss out their Motec units in favor of the unbeatable ProEfi. I should warn the boys at motec that they will have to shut down due to this new revolutionary ECU!:hail:
 
#16 · (Edited)
Throw in the Bosch's, Magnetti Marelli's, EFI tech (both USA and Italy) along with all the rest!!!

(how the hell I knew this thread was going to go down the shitter..)
 
#17 ·
Oh yea, its about to get sidetracked!
 
#20 · (Edited)
JZ1

a couple of quick questions on your configuration.

You said stock TT AT. You still have all the amenities in the car (AC/ PS etc).

Are you pushing the stock IAC through the Pro-EFI?

What is base idle speed set at?

On the ignition front. what are you planning on going to? HKS DLI? Stock?

How is the logging of the Pro-EFI or more specifically what are you (yes YOU) monitoring.\

Have the CAN gauge? thoughts?
 
#22 · (Edited)
Sigh, I guess in the middle of the kids bickering I'll try to pass on some info.

I have EVERYTHING in the car. All wiring is Toyota and American Yazaki connectors and wires. Brackets for things are reused Toyota stuff like the bracket for my relocated ignition capacitor. Its from a 2002 Prius airbag harness. I'm not kidding when I say the car looks 100% stock and works like a 100% stock car. So much so I have Supra so called "experts" and actual experts look at the car and don't see anything I've done to it. Chip, Ken H, Ryan H, Larry, Sarkis etc can chime is as they have seen my car and know what I'm talking about.

Base idle is 800 rpm. ProEFI allows separate in gear and out of gear target idles too. I keep both at 800 but may lower it a bit out of gear as I play with it. I run around 800 RPM for a smooth idle with the cams.

I mentioned in my first post I have an MSD DIS2 and DIS4. I needed 2 boxes to do all 6 coils. Up to 1100 RWHP you don't need anything with this ECU because it accurately controls the ignitor dwell.

Logging for the time being is one of the cons. The only way to log is to have the laptop attached and the parameters on the screen (like logging parameter list on AEM). What is nice is if you lose power like the battery on the laptop dies (done that a few times) the data isn't lost. A seperate CAN module is available for logging without laptop but Jason isn't using that anymore. This will change in a bit as Jason is working on a module that is much less money with an SD card to store data on. Soon it will store the data and be transferred wirelessly. I can log anything I want though. Even really deep processes etc not just simple stuff.

What is super cool is the over ride function. You can tell the ECM to simulate anything you want to test the outputs. My initial tune was made by powering the ECU, telling it the RPM, Load, temps, throttle, everything and seeing what it would output to injectors and timing. Using past AEM logs I built a whole map without it being attached to the car.

I have the CAN gauge in the car. Previously I put the AEM serial gauge ibehind the factory clock with the time set buttons running the gauge. It plugged in to the factory clock connector. I even had a green LED display so it looked like a clock. I plan to do something similar to the CAN gauge. I can't wait for the coding to be finished where I can change parameters with the gauge like Hi/Lo boost, timing maps, trims, rev limits etc. It is super helpful for tuning too because I can have it tell me tuning info like pressure ratio and corrections when I pick up something I want to change.

I won't lie and say I initally plugged it in and drove away as is. A few of us spent a lot of time working with Jason to make it do what we needed so that when other's buy it you can put it in and drive away happy. Once most of that stuff was worked out, I put in some values and took it out. I really don't have much time in the fuel curves etc.

What has been nice is that earlier today I complained to Jason I wished I could do something on the trans control. While I was testing line pressure control on Guido's car with the AEM, Jason called me to say he took care of my request and he sent the firmware to my email. He can't do it that fast for everything but its nice when you can make requests. Yes I know other high end ECUs will often do that but don't expect that from most companies.
 
#25 ·
Yeah it is out. Larry has the link in his section. Like the new AEM it is a tough call to announce a new product then work on getting it done right and out for sale. It never gets done as soon as you want.
 
#32 · (Edited)
JZ1

it is the Microsoft dot net infrastructure. Probably ASP.NET 2.0 or maybe 3.5. Usually downloaded when you go to the windows update site and click on the express update.

On the Pro-EFI front. Hey, it is a new product and I (yes there are a few of us ;) ) understand there will be growing pains. But it seems like most of the "big" issues are resolved! On the CANbus tuning. I would not call it tuning. Tweaking would be the more appropiate word and limited tweaking would be the ideal thing (like the HKS "monitor" for the HKS V-pro). Full control of the EMS over the CANBus.. i would be cautious doing tuning over the CANBus, yes it can be done (more than enough head room at 1Mbps) but that is additional overhead and when you are using the CANBus to do monitoring. It becomes really "chatty" :)
 
#29 ·
Thanks for posting your results! Someone with your background, praising the ProEFI, saids a lot. I lost interest due to user end software, laptop cable connector ($$$) and having to bypass the factory injector resistor pack. All hidden cost and headaches. I'm sure with another year of development this will be a good option for most of the current AEM users. :)
 
#42 ·
Aright, sorry then. Watching it (Saad staging his car at the Texas meet) in person gave the distinct impression that he was having to take extra long to build boost as no one would choose to stage like that on purpose. Apparently it was by choice. Would be nice if I could play with one of these things...
 
#43 ·
I have to say that I am excited about getting the ProEFI in my car. I know JZ1 has spent a lot of time working on this thing to get it working the way it needs to in his car. A lot of you people know him, but those that don't, you have to understand that he wants his car to be as stock appearing as possible, but more importantly, having as close to stock driveablility as possible. His car is a true sleeper that kicks some serious for being a full weight stock twin car. And like he said, he has everything in it. It is not lightened at all.

I have the beta version of the AEM in my car right now and am working through lots of things that AEM is testing. The biggest thing they are trying to fix is how the automatic transmission shifts and operates. That has always been an issue when compared to stock toyota transmission. I think it will allow for more fine tuning of the ECU, but it's a ways away from being done yet.

The ProEFI shifts so much smoother than the AEM that it is ridiculous. JZ1 showed me at his house the other day. He started the car (1st crank without waiting at all) and then shifted from park to reverse to park to drive, etc. The shifts were so smooth that you had to be there to believe it. The car didn't lurch at all and it was soooo smooth. I hate him already for that. :) And his line pressure is much higher than mine, so the way the Pro EFI controls it is pretty cool. He then pulled up the emergency brake which engaged the two step and that sucker stalled up to about 4k in about half a second. That will be really helpful for launching the car. You won't have to worry about burning up your converter keeping it stalled for so long. I think it would be great for bigger turboes as well, but it sounds like Saad has covered that.

The biggest issue for the Pro EFI has been getting the automatic transmission issues straightened out. A 6 speed is much easier to tune and get working right away. The AT has so many more things to deal with that it's taken some time to get them all figured out. I know Jason has been working his ass off to get everything done as soon as possible. And JZ1 has too. I think it will be done soon and can't wait to have it in my car.

And I'm waiting patiently to drive JZ1's car. I want to see the difference in how it drives compared to my AEM car.
 
#44 · (Edited)
Thanks Guido. I'm not one to get very excited or emotional about stuff but I was so cranked up and excited about how well I was able to get my car running I had to start this thread. The other day Jason had to hear about 10 minutes of me blabbing praise after my last test drive.

Chevy eater, I'd say don't be too quick to dismiss this ECU as I know its been a while since introduction. Knowing you, doing your own work I too would never get something I couldn't work on myself. The user software should allow you to do just about anything you'd want and believe you would love it's capabilities. It does work very well and tuning VE method and A/Fs in desired equivilancy (also normal A/F value) makes things super easy. Once the VE map is set, you just tell it the AF ratio and it gets done.

I forgot to mention, the last time I went to the track, I had my wife drive the car home while I made some tweaks. I asked if she noticed anything that felt strange or that she didn't like and she thought it drove just fine. Nothing she thought felt unusual or harsh. For reference, her driver is an `08 LS460L. I'm not saying my car drives like our Lexus, but for her not to notice anything like shift issues, surging, unstable idle, throttle tip in issues, or converter lock up (I have a pretty loose converter) says something.
 
#46 ·
Seeing as my Supra is a daily driver, when I drive your car I will tell you what I think of the driveablility as I'm pretty picky about that as well. It would be nice to drive it for a week, but I know that won't happen. :)
 
#45 ·
JZ1 - I'm looking forward to tuning my ProEFI tomorrow, Brad Brooks is coming out and we're going to work on some things on the street, and some things on the dyno.

Like you I'm real picky about how the transmission shifts, thats the #1 reason I ditched the AEM, just right out of the box, with a base tune from Jason, the car starts, drives, trans shifts nicely, it just needs some fine tuning

I played with the idle the other day, had it idling at 700rpm (with 264 cams) and seemed fine, just needed to be leaned out.
 
#47 ·
I have a different set of questions for you. How would the Pro EFI handle the GT28R upgraded turbos? I know you said the transition on the stock twins is hardly noticeable now, but with these turbos it seems they lag just a bit more. Would the Pro EFI be able to take care of that and make better use of the extra power they are supposed to have? And, would you need to upgrade your fuel system if you end up running over 500 HP which seems to be approaching the limit of the stock fuel system. And lastly, when AEM had my car they said the stock intercooler heat soaks pretty quickly. With these other turbos, would a front mount intercooler be a better choice?
 
#50 ·
You can completely control the transition time and speed. Therefore you will be able to smooth it out somewhat. You can control the speed at which the valves open too but remember that with larger turbos, the difference between running one and two turbos is greater so you will fell the second turbo come on harder!! Larger turbos lag more and there is not much you can do about that. I would suggest a fuel system for over 500 RWHP no matter what ECU you are using. A front mount IC is never a bad idea... lower air intake temps = free horsepower!