I am interested in a stock 93-97 SC300 or SC400 for a daily, and was curious of the reliability, mainly the electrical gadgets. It seems that 90% of the car is well built, with the other 10% being electrical gadgets that are nice, but can fail at a young age.
So far, I have driven a 96 SC300 with 179k and a 92 SC400 with 64k. The only thing that didn’t work on the high mile 96 was the tilt part of the wheel, but I understand that there is a jerry rig fix for that. The seats were unbelievably mint, leading me to believe the leather was better in the later years, but stiffer. Or is the SC400 leather just softer?
The low mile SC400 surprisingly had several things that did not work: the mirrors, which I believe are tied to the memory seats, which didn’t seem to work. The driver’s window just had the regulator replaced (64k, WTF?), but the window switch was not making good contact, requiring you to push extra hard.
The leather was softer than the SC300, but had a worn bolster. Another thing I should not see on a 64k mile car. Seat heaters did not work. Car had a clunk from the rear (loose shock mount maybe?). I wasn’t able to really step into it like I wanted, but was not impressed with the V8’s torque. But it was a smooth engine. I hear they are thirsty!
As of now, I will keep my eye out for a mint one (just missed one), but my impression of the cars is so-so. They drive really nice, but I don’t want a car that I have to work on all the time. I am picky about having everything work. I am sure parts are not cheap.
Opinions appreciated!
Thanks,
Al
So far, I have driven a 96 SC300 with 179k and a 92 SC400 with 64k. The only thing that didn’t work on the high mile 96 was the tilt part of the wheel, but I understand that there is a jerry rig fix for that. The seats were unbelievably mint, leading me to believe the leather was better in the later years, but stiffer. Or is the SC400 leather just softer?
The low mile SC400 surprisingly had several things that did not work: the mirrors, which I believe are tied to the memory seats, which didn’t seem to work. The driver’s window just had the regulator replaced (64k, WTF?), but the window switch was not making good contact, requiring you to push extra hard.
The leather was softer than the SC300, but had a worn bolster. Another thing I should not see on a 64k mile car. Seat heaters did not work. Car had a clunk from the rear (loose shock mount maybe?). I wasn’t able to really step into it like I wanted, but was not impressed with the V8’s torque. But it was a smooth engine. I hear they are thirsty!
As of now, I will keep my eye out for a mint one (just missed one), but my impression of the cars is so-so. They drive really nice, but I don’t want a car that I have to work on all the time. I am picky about having everything work. I am sure parts are not cheap.
Opinions appreciated!
Thanks,
Al