S
supraholic'94tt
·Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
kinda confused. took a look at blue book for supras. '94's low blue book is 10000, 12,000 for 95's and so on. i think that sounds a little too cheap
Whats your opinion?
Whats your opinion?
The great milage was a big factor im sureSupratrbo2 said:I had a red 94 TT with 22k miles on it - garage kept, flawless paint, etc. etc. and it was recently became a 'total loss' in an accident. Allstate wanted to give me 22k for the car, but I argued and went thru arbitration. Ended up getting 30k for the car, which I still felt was too low.
I picked up a 98 TT with 5400 miles on it and paid 42k for it. I felt it was worth it, the car is amazing and the blue book 'value' is useless for a car of this caliber.
IMHO
I definitely agree the car is what someone will pay for it. But, face it there are far to many 190,000+ '94s trying to go for 25,000+ which is lude. for that price 50,000 miles and under is preferable.KERR said:yep you are correct. My family ownes a car lot, and the nada is based on what car bring at the auction. So those of us with supras, vipers, nsx's and some porsches it kills us. for example this is what this weeks book says about Supras.
98 twin turbo,
extra clean $26750
Clean $26050
average $24550 this and rough is usually what a dealer puts in your trade in.
rough $ 22500
A supra is like any other car, To the right person its worth a lot, to the rest of the world its just another car. I know when i drive mine people ask if its for sale, I say sure hit $38K and they go MY GOD YOU COULD HAVE HAD A VETTE FOR THAT!!!
LOL ...he said 14 years later...I definitely agree the car is what someone will pay for it. But, face it there are far to many 190,000+ '94s trying to go for 25,000+ which is lude. for that price 50,000 miles and under is preferable.