That is what I am running. I just got the rail and injectors in one week ago. Feels much better now!!!TT BomB said:Ditto, but also want to hear from someone running the 67 p-trim too.
Thanks
Thanks silvino! finally I got a answer on the sound aspect of the 67 with anti-surge comp housing!!!!silvino said:It sounds cool. I don't know what the Sp71 sounds like but my CTC67H GTQ sounds like people are talking with the airplane whirr.![]()
randy said:Thanks silvino! finally I got a answer on the sound aspect of the 67 with anti-surge comp housing!!!!
Can you post your most recent dyno? Also are you using a 3 or 3.5" downpipe? Cast or tubular manifold? Seriously considering this set up with a 3.5" downpipe. Is there much lag difference{67GTQ .68a/r} compared to a T63 .68 a/r P trim?
![]()
Villain said:I didn't even know there was an anti surge cover made for the 67, and after owning a 67 for the past 6 months I honestly don't see a need for one. I have tried everything to see if I can get it to surge and it wont. I have had it in 4th, 5th, even 6th gear on the highway at low rpm's >3000 rolled into it and floored it and it has never surged. I had a 70, and 71 prior to this 67 and you could never do that with them especially the 70 it was terrible. So unless your just looking for the sound effect I don't think this is anything I would spend any extra money on :dunno:
Jesse
PT-67GTQ
Ps these are all Precision turbos I'm speeking of.
Thanks for the info dude! Are you running a 3 or 3.5" downpipe? Would the larger downpipe like 3.5" or 4" help spool the 67 earlier? I am currently running HKS ti so do you think it be benificial? Are you able to get a good launch with this turbo? Meaning If I ran to about 100mph against a SP63 P.68 would I get owned?silvino said:
Essentially the whp on this dyno is 26psi since I didn't hold 30 psi until redline due to wg issues. The torque number is right for 30 psi though. This is with the RPS big torque header so it's a bit laggier and adds a bit of top end.