Supra Forums banner
1 - 14 of 14 Posts

·
old school poster
Joined
·
553 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
i am in the process of installing tein re's in my supra and i noticed that the front coilover only has about 1.5" of travel when you factor in the bumpstop.
im just wondering if this is normal for re's? i know it has a stiff spring rate so it wouldnt compress much anyways but that seems really short
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
550 Posts
cullen said:
i am in the process of installing tein re's in my supra and i noticed that the front coilover only has about 1.25" of travel when you factor in the bumpstop.
im just wondering if this is normal for re's? i know it has a stiff spring rate so it wouldnt compress much anyways but that seems really short

Assuming you've lowered it somewhat, that sounds about right. There isn't much available travel there to begin with before the front tire hits the top of the fender liner, and lowering it uses up some of it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
266 Posts
cullen said:
im not talking about the wheel travel, im talking about theshock travel.
even with the shock at full extension, it has only 1.5" of travel with the bumpstop
The front Supra motion ratio is somewhere in the .52 - .6 range, so if your shock has 1.5" travel that would equate to roughly 2.5" wheel travel. That does sound somewhat limited though. Set the spring as high as possible and use the telescoping feature on the body to adjust height.
 

·
old school poster
Joined
·
553 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
i am only using the tein bumpstop

i have the spring perches set up high as it will go. i have the shock fully extended. and it still only has a max of 1.5" travel between the spacer and bumpstop

ill just call tein and see what they say.
 

·
old school poster
Joined
·
553 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
im not sure if you have handled re's or not but they have an extremly high spring rate, dampening rate and very little travel. if i bottom these out then i would be having other problems besides my tires hitting the fender.

the max travel i have now would be 2" i have much more than 2" till my tire hits the inner fender or otherwise.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
550 Posts
cullen said:
im not sure if you have handled re's or not but they have an extremly high spring rate, dampening rate and very little travel. if i bottom these out then i would be having other problems besides my tires hitting the fender.

the max travel i have now would be 2" i have much more than 2" till my tire hits the inner fender or otherwise.
I haven't run REs, but I have run 1000lbs. springs and still bottomed the tire into the fender with bumpstops that were too short.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
13,395 Posts
My RA's have the same spring rate as the RE and if you have the ride height wrong it will bottom out as Eric describes. Eric and I have a long conversation on the subject with Carl at Thunderhill a little over a year ago. :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
550 Posts
badkarma said:
The front Supra motion ratio is somewhere in the .52 - .6 range, so if your shock has 1.5" travel that would equate to roughly 2.5" wheel travel. That does sound somewhat limited though. Set the spring as high as possible and use the telescoping feature on the body to adjust height.
how much travel does the stock suspention supposed to have at stock ride height??
 
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top