I am the Lord of Darkness
i did read, but any know why the walls came down on mission objective?
Nope. Feel free to look around for that law or group of laws. Governments always test on their own citizens.Theres no international treaties for human rights?
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
Nope. Feel free to look around for that law or group of laws. Governments always test on their own citizens.
Best trust the government with psychological agendas too, I guess. You'd never know about any of the modern one's, anyway. Not published.
Pretty sure even if someone were to tell you, you'd dismiss it too.
No laws against those, either.
listed also in there, the OHCHRThere was nothing in the entire page that outlaws testing on a country's own citizens.
Not a single line.
Torture, POWs, war environment, of course.
There is a monumental difference, legally.
There is no law against testing on a country's citizens.
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
You really want to believe what you want.listed also in there, the OHCHR
did you forget about the rest of the geneva convention that doesn't have to do with war? or you just trying to ignore the rest of the signed and agreed upon rules/laws to say . "there is no law man!!!! the gubment gots us!"
let me just say, even though there are these things called "laws" it doesn't mean the government or anyone else will follow them, laws don't protect you.
There are NO LAWS against testing on your own people. Geneva doesn't apply. Not sure why you have such a difficult time understanding these very simple things.Article 7
1. The State Party in the territory under whose jurisdiction a person alleged to have committed any offence referred to in article 4 is found shall in the cases contemplated in article 5, if it does not extradite him, submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution.
2. These authorities shall take their decision in the same manner as in the case of any ordinary offence of a serious nature under the law of that State. In the cases referred to in article 5, paragraph 2, the standards of evidence required for prosecution and conviction shall in no way be less stringent than those which apply in the cases referred to in article 5, paragraph 1.
3. Any person regarding whom proceedings are brought in connection with any of the offences referred to in article 4 shall be guaranteed fair treatment at all stages of the proceedings.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_StatesAs of 2007, not a single U.S. government researcher had been prosecuted for human experimentation. The preponderance of the victims of U.S. government experiments have not received compensation or, in many cases, acknowledgment of what was done to them.
True.There are NO LAWS against testing on your own people. Geneva doesn't apply.
When World War II ended, the advanced state of German technology regarding the organophosphorous nerve agents, such as tabun, sarin and soman, had surprised the Allies and they were eager to capitalise on it. Subsequent research took the newly discovered German nerve agents as a starting point, and eventually VX nerve agent was developed at Porton Down in 1952.
In the late 1940s and early 1950s, research and development at Porton Down was aimed at providing Britain with the means to arm itself with a modern nerve agent-based capability and to develop specific means of defence against these agents. In the end these aims came to nothing on the offensive side because of the decision to abandon any sort of British chemical warfare capability. On the defensive side there were years of difficult work to develop the means of prophylaxis, therapy, rapid detection and identification, decontamination, and more effective protection of the body against nerve agents, capable of exerting effects through the skin, the eyes and respiratory tract.
Tests were carried out on servicemen to determine the effects of nerve agents on human subjects, with one recorded death due to a nerve gas experiment. There have been persistent allegations of unethical human experimentation at Porton Down, such as those relating to the death of Leading Aircraftman Ronald Maddison, aged 20, in 1953. Maddison was taking part in sarin nerve agent toxicity tests; sarin was dripped onto his arm and he died shortly afterwards.
of course i have zero experience in the matters, just like you, i don't know why that's even a question lol.You really want to believe what you want.
Testing nuclear, chemical or biological weapons on your own citizens, has never been illegal.
Your entire argument is not valid. Period.
You simply have zero experience in these legal matters. ZERO.
Here is the article 7 from what you submitted.
There are NO LAWS against testing on your own people. Geneva doesn't apply. Not sure why you have such a difficult time understanding these very simple things.
No, it's not ignoring laws... That's stupid to even bring up.
You don't even understand how categorizing people, works.
Heck, all you have to do is Google these things.
Here's a wiki on what you're trying to present. Notice how no researchers get into trouble? Because there's nothing legally to cite.
I like how it says "illegally" in the beginning, but doesn't tell you from what codes. There aren't any written anywhere, which makes it illegal to test on your own citizens.
that last word....Unethical human experimentation in the United States describes numerous experiments performed on human test subjects in the United States that have been considered unethical, and were often performed illegally
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.htmlNo researcher broke any law. The government position, was it was humane.
Cite the law that applies, please.
if you want U.S. law there's that, i have no doubt other worse governments around the world don't care. and like i said before, the standards we lived by previously, and the standards of today are different. so i don't deny that testing was done and no one was able to do anything about it because there was no law saying the people who regulated everything couldn't get away with everything.(1) Research that is conducted or supported by a federal department or agency, whether or not it is regulated as defined in §46.102, must comply with all sections of this policy.
The list below displays the agencies and departments that have signed onto the Common Rule and their CFR numbers. Hyperlinks are to areas of a department or agency Web site that have been suggested to HHS as entry points for those interested in human subject protection activities of the department or agency.
7 CFR Part 1c - Department of Agriculture
10 CFR Part 745 - Department of Energy
14 CFR Part 1230 - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
15 CFR Part 27 - Department of Commerce - National Institute of Standards and Technology
16 CFR Part 1028 - Consumer Product Safety Commission
22 CFR Part 225 - Agency for International Development (USAID)
24 CFR Part 60 - Department of Housing and Urban Development
28 CFR Part 46 - Department of Justice - National Institute of Justice
32 CFR Part 219 - Department of Defense
34 CFR Part 97 - Department of Education
38 CFR Part 16 - Department of Veterans Affairs - Office of Research Oversight - Office of Research and Development
40 CFR Part 26 - Environmental Protection Agency - Research and Development
45 CFR Part 46 - Department of Health and Human Services
45 CFR Part 690 - National Science Foundation
49 CFR Part 11 - Department of Transportation
Although they have not issued the Common Rule in regulations, three other departments and agencies comply with all subparts of 45 CFR part 46. These include:
The Central Intelligence Agency, by executive order, must comply with all subparts of 45 CFR Part 46. (Executive Order 12333, paragraph 2.10)
The Department of Homeland Security, created after issuance of the Common Rule, has chosen to apply all subparts of 45 CFR part 46 to its human research activities. (6 U.S.C. section 112)
The Social Security Administration was separated from HHS in 1994 and, absent action by the Administrator, must apply all regulations that applied to SSA before the separation. (42 U.S.C. section 901)
Several non-HHS federal departments and agencies have additional regulations in place for research involving special populations or for human subjects research in general. The federal department/agency that conducts or supports research retains final authority for determining whether an institution has complied with its regulations for the protection of human subjects. If HHS receives an allegation or indication of noncompliance related to human subject research that is conducted or supported solely by a Common Rule department/agency other than HHS, HHS will refer the matter to that department/agency for review and action as appropriate.
Investigators are encouraged to review the regulations of the funding agency to determine whether additional regulations apply. Also, many agencies have not adopted subparts B, C, or D and grantees of those agencies are not necessarily bound by them. Grantees should consult their funding agency for guidance.