Supra Forums banner
1 - 17 of 17 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hey guys! I'm looking into getting some 18x9.5 +38 wheels, but ideally I'd like to avoid any fender modification if possible. Are these generally too big, or are there a set of tires that would allow me to run these and keep from rubbing? I'm on stock suspension, but I was looking into getting some Fortune Auto 500's for some spirited daily driving. Any help would be appreciated, as I'm terrible with tire sizing.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
Hey guys! I'm looking into getting some 18x9.5 +38 wheels, but ideally I'd like to avoid any fender modification if possible. Are these generally too big, or are there a set of tires that would allow me to run these and keep from rubbing? I'm on stock suspension, but I was looking into getting some Fortune Auto 500's for some spirited daily driving. Any help would be appreciated, as I'm terrible with tire sizing.

These are the wheels in question.
 

· Registered
1988 Supra, NA, Auto, 116K Miles
Joined
·
355 Posts
A lot of folks here run 18s, but it's really pushing it (if you want to lower your car that is) I found 17" to be absolutely perfect on mine with I think 40 aspect ratio tires.
I only say this because you will run into issues much faster with that rim size if you are lowering a lot.

Then again, I actually can't lower my ride anymore more than it is with the stock mudflaps in place, but even then, the stock exhaust pipe in the back appears to impede going much lower anyway. So in my case at least, 18s probably would be ok.

Not a huge fan of Avid, but I know the look you're going for, here's my ride on Fitment
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
14,241 Posts
The sizing is good for the MK3, especially if you go a little narrower up front (say an 18x9 or 18x8.5 with a +30-35ish offset) for more steering clearance. The 18x9.5+38 up front can rub especially with bigger tires and when lowered. In the back a 275/35/18 is no problem.

AVID1's are cheap garbage and the AV6's are cheap ripoffs of a Volk TE37 that are heavier and weaker than the original. I don't have $4k to drop on wheels either so I get it on the budget struggle, but I'd strongly encourage you to buy budget wheels that are at least original designs from the makers and not blatant ripoffs of another company's work. Consider Enkei's offerings if you want a high quality wheel that is light and strong but also at a lower price. They have a lot of styles available in 18x9.5 +38's and similar sizing.

Good call on the Fortune Auto 500's, they are one of the highest quality coilovers offered for the MK3 today.
 

· Registered
1988 Supra, NA, Auto, 116K Miles
Joined
·
355 Posts
Yeah I originally wanted AVIDs I think and HUGE rear tires, but a user here told me all about AVID and the knockoff thing along with I would hate my NA ride on that kind of non-square setup.
I took his advice and went with made-to-order Enkeis and a square 245 setup. Very happy with it and the wheels are absolutely phenomenal. With the ones I picked at least, very few have them so they are unique.

I would highly advise for quality Japanese wheels and you don't have to spend that much either.
I went with these on my 01' Celica GT-S and they are very similar to my Supra ones, but almost HALF the cost. They do look really nice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2jzturbo92

· Registered
1988 Supra, NA, Auto, 116K Miles
Joined
·
355 Posts
Looks awesome dude. Very good wheel choice.
Also I got my Fortune 500 coilovers through their ebay site for $1440 (you can make them an offer) so you may want to go that route.
 

· Registered
1988 Supra, NA, Auto, 116K Miles
Joined
·
355 Posts
@BlkWaterJon I would go with something wider in the front. at least 225, but prefer 245.
For reference, this is 245/45 on 17x8.5 +30mm front and 275/40 on 17x9.5 +38mm rear.
View attachment 286615
Yeah I'm 245 all around. I would suggest this in front as well.
Still would have loved HUGE FAT rear tires, but again a member on here said the NA Supra would be awful with them. Ended up eating a $200 re-stocking fee from Fitment because it was late in the process, but I don't regret it.

Props to the OP for opting for the ceramic coating. I did on both my wheel sets.

Hopefully OP's Enkeis don't take too long since they are on back order. Took mine over six months to even be cued up to ship out from Japan, though my Celica ones they already had on hand. (also the mystery shirt was worth it hah)
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
14,241 Posts
I'd call about the backorder time on the 18x8.5's before swiping the proverbial card.

Vivid racing is showing both of those sizes and offsets in stock: Enkei Tuning Wheels - T6R

I would never run a 215 on an 8.5in wide wheel! That's way too narrow! I'd run a 235/40/18, 245/40/18, or a 255/35/18 to match a 275/35/18 rear. The 235 and 255 in those profiles will be slightly shorter, the 245 will be around 0.1-0.2in taller than the 275's in back depending on brand. But it'll be so close that ABS sensors etc almost always won't care.

Those tires. Oof. Dude those are intended to be bought by the pallet for drift events. I would skip the ceramic coating (you can do that yourself with many nice wheel care products) and spend more on a quality set of tires.
Good tires are one of the few affordable luxuries out there. Michelin PS4's or PSS's would be ideal but they are spendy. For something less expensive I'd heartily recommend the Advan Apex V601's. No sense spending all that good money on high end coilovers and good wheels to put shit tires on them.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
I'd call about the backorder time on the 18x8.5's before swiping the proverbial card. Vivid racing is showing both of those sizes and offsets in stock: Enkei Tuning Wheels - T6R I would never run a 215 on an 8.5in wide wheel! That's way too narrow! I'd run a 235/40/18, 245/40/18, or a 255/35/18 to match a 275/35/18 rear. The 235 and 255 in those profiles will be slightly shorter, the 245 will be around 0.1-0.2in taller than the 275's in back depending on brand. But it'll be so close that ABS sensors etc almost always won't care. Those tires. Oof. Dude those are intended to be bought by the pallet for drift events. I would skip the ceramic coating (you can do that yourself with many nice wheel care products) and spend more on a quality set of tires. Good tires are one of the few affordable luxuries out there. Michelin PS4's or PSS's would be ideal but they are spendy. For something less expensive I'd heartily recommend the Advan Apex V601's. No sense spending all that good money on high end coilovers and good wheels to put shit tires on them.
Thanks everyone for the final bit of info I needed to finish this out. I’ll switch the fronts to one of the suggested sizes, and I’ll check out Vivid for the wheels. Yeah, for the tires I pretty much just used those as placeholders until I had a solid confirmation that they were the right size. Definitely won’t end up running those on my new setup. Thanks again for everyone’s help! It’s much appreciated.
 

· Registered
1988 Supra, NA, Auto, 116K Miles
Joined
·
355 Posts
As for the tires, yeah obviously pilot sport 4S is the best out there right now reasonably. Half the reason I got them is just so I could throw the logos on there from tirestickers.com lol.
You have a lot of options, but if you want to save money, I hear Falken is the best bang for buck out there. It's what originally came on my sup, but they were fairly old (not worn) and let the car break loose a bit too much. I'm sure nicer new ones are as good as you are going to get outside Michelin

$2,000-ISH (no need to go nuts like my $3000 PS4S/Enkei build!) isn't a bad goal at all to have with a tire package purchase from fitment. Makes the one-year monthly payment very reasonable.
@BlkWaterJon I would go with something wider in the front. at least 225, but prefer 245.
For reference, this is 245/45 on 17x8.5 +30mm front and 275/40 on 17x9.5 +38mm rear.
That ruby shade of red is AMAZING. I like the way it looks. My Celica has I think "absolute red" and it's just this super bright RED RED color.
I see you have the same fading on your front upper lip bumper as I do. My lower bumper is starting to crack and peel pretty bad and the rear is bubbling and looking rough. The car was MINT when I bought it, but it only took a month out in the sun. Not sure if yours has any of those issues. The targa top has a bunch of dots where you can see the primer now too.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
362 Posts
That ruby shade of red is AMAZING. I like the way it looks. My Celica has I think "absolute red" and it's just this super bright RED RED color.
I see you have the same fading on your front upper lip bumper as I do. My lower bumper is starting to crack and peel pretty bad and the rear is bubbling and looking rough. The car was MINT when I bought it, but it only took a month out in the sun. Not sure if yours has any of those issues. The targa top has a bunch of dots where you can see the primer now too.
I love the color. Its called medium red pearl (3h4). the car was mint when I got it too. Basically all the painted plastic parts started to fade. I had a bunch of dents, scratches, and rust from daily driving and parking outside, including in the winter. Then it sat for 5 years after until I was able to buy a house with a garage. I painted the car last year, but I am not too happy with the results. I am not too worried about it though, I will probably re-paint it correctly again in the future.

not bad for a 1st time paint job in the garage
Wheel Tire Car Vehicle Window


Wheel Tire Vehicle Car Automotive side marker light
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,499 Posts
Today I learned, thanks to this thread, that the RPF1 legacy is expanding, still, in 2023!


Soooo... yeah... about those 18x11's... Do want.

@Wreckless You know, I find it funny, us Supra guys almost always seem to go with tires that are wider than the wheels, yet the Miata world seems to square them up a lot better. My race setup is a 205/50 on a 15x8. My winter setup is a (I think) 195/60 on a 15x8. I don't think a 215 is a bad match for an 8.5" wheel, but personally I wouldn't go any skinnier than the stock tires were. I had a pretty bad experience with a 255/40 on Mk4 17x8 wheels, you could actually feel lateral movement in the tire, mid curve. As in, you'd turn in, it would feel good, then the wheel would move from the center of the tire beads to the outer edges of the tire beads, so you felt this really strange transitional period in every turn. Felt very balloon-y.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,101 Posts
Yeah, we Americans have a cultural belief that wider tires are always "better" performing somehow. More often, the opposite is true. We used to mess with this stuff all the time at the Proving Grounds. With no increase in power, wider tires almost always slowed lap times. Even for offroading there is this cult of wider tires. The reality is a higher ground PSI of narrower tires provides better grip and greater directional stability on a broad spectrum of low friction surfaces. I shake my head at all the "tough" trucks driving around in cities with 40 series huge rubber that sticks out 3" beyond the fenders. Those would last about 3 minutes offroading. Stockish size and high quality rubber will get you REAL performance, or you can go with the mere LOOK of performance.....
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
14,241 Posts
Today I learned, thanks to this thread, that the RPF1 legacy is expanding, still, in 2023!


Soooo... yeah... about those 18x11's... Do want.

@Wreckless You know, I find it funny, us Supra guys almost always seem to go with tires that are wider than the wheels, yet the Miata world seems to square them up a lot better. My race setup is a 205/50 on a 15x8. My winter setup is a (I think) 195/60 on a 15x8. I don't think a 215 is a bad match for an 8.5" wheel, but personally I wouldn't go any skinnier than the stock tires were. I had a pretty bad experience with a 255/40 on Mk4 17x8 wheels, you could actually feel lateral movement in the tire, mid curve. As in, you'd turn in, it would feel good, then the wheel would move from the center of the tire beads to the outer edges of the tire beads, so you felt this really strange transitional period in every turn. Felt very balloon-y.
A 255/40 is way too wide for a 17x8, or even a 17x8.5. Stock was a 235/40 on the MKIV 17x8 and most folks do a 245/45/17 front and a 275/40/17 rear on MKIV wheels since that matches a ~25.8in (IIRC) rolling diameter front & rear, and a lot of decent tires are available in those sizes even to this day.

Most tire makers are including a width range with a given exact width the tire was designed for, which makes this process a lot simpler. Go too narrow on the wheel and yeah you're dealing with all that weird wiggling and tire instability, and the less sidewall height there is (like with a 35 or 40 series) the more spectacularly terrible this gets.
Go too wide on the wheel (stretching the tire) and you're stiffening the sidewall a ton which could be good or bad depending on your goals. For steering feel its great, forward traction on a drive axle or ride quality on any axle, it's terrible :)


Yeah, we Americans have a cultural belief that wider tires are always "better" performing somehow. More often, the opposite is true. We used to mess with this stuff all the time at the Proving Grounds. With no increase in power, wider tires almost always slowed lap times. Even for offroading there is this cult of wider tires. The reality is a higher ground PSI of narrower tires provides better grip and greater directional stability on a broad spectrum of low friction surfaces. I shake my head at all the "tough" trucks driving around in cities with 40 series huge rubber that sticks out 3" beyond the fenders. Those would last about 3 minutes offroading. Stockish size and high quality rubber will get you REAL performance, or you can go with the mere LOOK of performance.....
It all depends entirely on why they're going wider.
If they're going wider because the car needs more lateral grip and is pushing like crazy in turns or struggling to stay on a racing line, wider tires of the same compound will make a huge improvement. But with more lateral grip you need more roll resistance in the suspension somewhere, more strength in all the steering parts, adjustments to the suspension to deal with the higher unsprung weight of the wider and heavier wheels and tires, the list goes on.
If the car in your example is holding a racing line very well, not pushing in turns, and generally staying together throughout a lap then the higher rolling resistance and driveline losses of the heavier/wider wheel & tire package will slow the car down, especially if it's a really fast track with some big straights.

Similarly, RWD high horsepower I totally agree there's a trend for folks to ignore the factor tire height plays in forward traction and just go wider, and going to a wider tire of an inferior compound will almost always be about the same or worse than a narrower tire on a good compound. Best is a wider and taller tire with a better compound. Is there a limit to how much additional width helps? Yep. Are most sports cars, especially 90's and 00's era sports cars set up with wheels and tires far too narrow for their performance abilities? Also yes.


We're in 100% agreement on the over-tire big lifted trucks. Back in my industry days, my shop buddies and I would finish off SEMA by getting a few too many drinks in and wandering through the displays of hackjob, over-lifted brodozers with the 24in bling bling wheels with knobby off-road style rubber band sidewalls, pointing out the terrible pinion angles, total absence of suspension travel, and sometimes total absence of other components like brakes, brake lines, or driveshafts. I remember one year there was a lifted blingy brodozer like that missing it's front driveshaft, but the builder had a sense of humor and painted a bluetooth symbol on the front diff's driveshaft flange. We laughed our asses off at that one.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,499 Posts
@Wreckless Bluetooth front diff? NICE! Need to figure one of those out for my truck...

I guess my experience on wheel width vs tire width might be skewed a bit by the Miata factor. There's no such thing as worrying about forward traction in those things... so I run 205/50/15 on a 15x8 all the time. Though on her Supra, we run a 295 on an 11.5" rear wheel, because PS4S tires aren't available any wider in an 18" wheel unfortunately. That car never struggled for grip either, so... yeah. Having the tire info is super helpful, and you won't see me putting a 245 on a 12" wide wheel, ever, so no worries there. :)

Tires are kinda my thing, if I know one thing about cars...
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Top