Supra Forums banner
21 - 40 of 1,200 Posts
We used the AK series for this...
 
Discussion starter · #23 ·
Great work Drew and Jeff on the R&D and the writeup! :D

I am stickying this.
Quick, thanks a lot man. I feel honoroed :love:

Drew,

That's some amazing work, my friend. Many, many thanks to you and those that assisted you. Excellent write-up and fairly easily understood even to my non-technical brain. This is a tremendous service to the community. Big congrats to you.

Quick, thanks for the sticky.

Ken.
Ken, receiving praise from you is not taken lightly for me. Of almost anyone in the community yours means the most.
 
Discussion starter · #24 ·
So I was doing a little more research tonight and have a question for Drew or Jeff. What's the part number on the dampers that you guys have? On Bilstein's site it lists two different dampers, there is a sport damper and a HD damper. The sport part numbers are B46-1841 (Front) and B46-1842 (Rear), while the HD part numbers are AK1242 (Front) and AK1243 (Rear). I'm just wondering what valving you guys are running or what valving Bilstein was referencing when they said 20% over stock. Also, the Bilstein worldwide catalog just lists B46-1792 and B46-1793 are B6 Sport Dampers for the supra and the 1841 and 1842 part numbers do not even show up.

Also the prices on the Sport are $121 each while the prices on the HD are $157 each. So I'm assuming there is some difference between them. The AK series is listed on the motorsports page as stock mounting shocks.

So I don't know what this means in terms of what you guys are running or what springs you can run with these shocks. Maybe this deserves a call to Bilstein on Monday, but it's hit or miss with them if you will get someone that can answer questions like this or someone who will just transfer you to someone else's voicemail.

Oh well, I'm just curious what you guys are running, if I just had to pick, I would probably go with the AK series because they probably have a little stiffer valving than the Sports. At least that's what I think, who knows. But then again, the Sports are cheaper especially if I'm just going to replace the piston and shims and all I need is the body. But I would like to see what valving you guys are running and throw it in another damper body that I can easily have a local place dyno for me.
I believe the other part number is discontinued. AK is the new and only version. I had the older version before and in terms of the valving it seemed identical. The only thing I noticed as a revision was the shaft wiper now being integrated into the body rather than a seperate o ring.
 
I have been enjoying my "gixxer_drew bilstein coilovers" for about a month now, driving on the street, and have only appreciated them more with time.
Thanks again Drew!
 
Discussion starter · #27 ·
Flaktech! I'm really happy to hear about your success! You just cut up the factory bump stops like I did right? I saw your post in the bilstein thread where you said you couldnt remember your car riding that nice. Did you ever get a chance to try them out on the twisty roads?
 
I really want to try and track down the bumpstop differences...

Flaktech, did you go from the stock shocks/springs to the coilovers or from some other setup?
 
What about any of these options?

Energy suspension:
Image
http://www.energysuspension.com/pages/sk_bsp1.html

Penske:
Image

http://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productdetails.asp?RecId=4797
There are either 2 or 3 different stiffness ratings for Penske bumpstops.

Koni:
Summit has a couple different offerings for Koni bump rubbers. But there's no pictures.

I'm sure there's other places that offer something that could work very well. How close are the shocks to bottoming out? How tall of a bumpstop would be needed? Or would a bumpstop even be needed or would the spring hit coil bind before there's even a chance of bottoming out the damper?
 
Drew, yeah, I only did the bump stops up front as I hadn't thought of it before installing the rears. I removed one "lobe" (the top-most,) and although the zip-tie test put the tie in the bump stop after a hard drive, I think it could have been some rough pavement that did it. I'll try that again & avoid the bad roads. While driving, there was no indication to me that it had bottomed out. My front ride height is at "3 fingers."

And yes, it felt harder to break the tires loose around some favorite local roads. My favorite part is that they stick even on some poor, wrinkled pavement where previously it was easy to lose traction if I didn't slow down.

Hiken, I've been on stock suspension (years ago), then Tein CS (1st-gen) coilovers, and most recently on Eibachs & Koni's, and stock sway bars the whole time.
 
nice write up Drew! and special thanks for me too since that I did the work on the suspension!! lolz! hehehe :)

anywayz, all I can say is that Drew's suspension combo really works well. Ive driven his car a couple of times right after I did the suspension swap and I can tell that this set-up is very well suited for the street & track. the ride is great, and the car grips very well while cornering. plus its affordable! I would definitely try this set-up on my MKIII, maybe in a couple of months or so... or as a B-day present in November! lolz!


aite, peace.
 
Discussion starter · #33 · (Edited)
What about any of these options?

Energy suspension:
Image
http://www.energysuspension.com/pages/sk_bsp1.html

Penske:
Image

http://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productdetails.asp?RecId=4797
There are either 2 or 3 different stiffness ratings for Penske bumpstops.

Koni:
Summit has a couple different offerings for Koni bump rubbers. But there's no pictures.

I'm sure there's other places that offer something that could work very well. How close are the shocks to bottoming out? How tall of a bumpstop would be needed? Or would a bumpstop even be needed or would the spring hit coil bind before there's even a chance of bottoming out the damper?
Wiisass I'll try to answer your question and also I will add in some info that I'm pretty sure you already know but meant for the general readership of the thread.

Yah those will probably work. at the least with a bit of trimming. about 1/2" of the bump stop will probably go into the upper spring perch. I dont recommend using a very long bump stop probably only a 1" is required because a lot of shaft is taken up inside of the stock upper hat so the shock internals are well protected. Mostly its there to keep your car from instantly handling different and insulating metal parts from hitting each other. I'm not sure on the coil bind. That simulator software that you have can it find that out for us?

The factory suspension is a BBSS (big bar soft spring ala stock car) setup any time you get both tires to move at once on a good size bump I think it goes into the bump stops thats even on the factory setup. So its actually harder to get the car into the bump stop on a corner than it is under regular driving and hitting a whoopdedo or rough pavement. I found that with the 250lb rear springs on my car I needed 2.5" of travel to avoid bottoming out the shock. When the car was lowered 2" I put some bump stop in there and only needed it when I would hit a huge transition from level ground to up a hill where the car was enduring a moment with like 2Gs downward (gravity, +1G) equally across the rears, and under the most extreme higher speed, at the edge of the tires type of corners. The problem was that the rears bottomed out first so when you got that far the car would go from under steer to neutral. Not that neuteral is a bad thing but it is when you dont expect it to happen. Plus bump stops are not an optimal spring. It became a non issue after bringing the car up to stock height after the after market body work was installed, I've got travel to spare now. I only needed like half an inch from there to avoid it completely. So I dont recommend to lower more than 1.5" from stock on this setup and less than that under heavy duty.

In the front the fenders were the issue before the suspension. The car also rode and handled noticeably better at the higher ride height. There were a lot of reasons I decided not to run the car so low or recommend it for use with this suspension.
 
I have some Energy Suspension bumpstops on order, so after I test the fitment out we will update the original post with part numbers and costs.
 
Great write up ! I applaud all of your efforts..

I currently run tein cs 1st gen coilovers and really dislike how they bounce around up front. I was going to try the tein ss but may consider this setup instead.

Does anyone have a pick of thier car lowered on this setup ? I am curious as to how big a fender gap there is when lowered to maximum "recommended" height.
I currently have about finger all around is that to low for the setup ?
 
Discussion starter · #36 · (Edited)
Thank you,

You will need about two finger space. If you run heavy loads I recommend more spacing or bump stops. The rear is of more concern than the front.

That is what I ended up with on mine though, you may have to play with it and adjust the height. Depends on your cars weight and other things that change from car to car.
 
I got my struts back from bilstein re-valved for 800# front and 525 # rears and i'm installing the rears right now.

Question, and this might help clarify for everyone doing this:

To run the ride height that I want (3 3/4") from fender to top of wheel (like my TRD's were), with the car elevated on a lift, my upper spring perch sits about 2" below the hat and obviously the spring and upper perch are loose... Now I am running 525's in the back so could it be that I might need longer springs in the back to compensate for the added rate?

or, should I purchase some helper springs for peace of mind?
 
I got my struts back from bilstein re-valved for 800# front and 525 # rears and i'm installing the rears right now.
How much did Bilstein charge for this and what was the turn around time?
 
Bilstein charges $65.00 / shock and it took 4 1/2 weeks. They have an express option if you give them $20.00 more / shock and I think they can get them back to you in 2 weeks.

You tell them what kind of valving you want, the spring rates you used to run and the ones you are going to be running and they send back the shocks with a dyno plot for each one.

The only problem is that for the AK series of shocks, they have to re-valve them in California.

hope that helps.
 
Discussion starter · #40 ·
I got my struts back from bilstein re-valved for 800# front and 525 # rears and i'm installing the rears right now.
Thats excellent news, I'm really excited to see how the revalve works out for you.
Question, and this might help clarify for everyone doing this:

To run the ride height that I want (3 3/4") from fender to top of wheel (like my TRD's were),
This measurement is to the inside fender of the fender? Is this front or rear? Can you take a photo and show me where your measuring from and to?

A stiffer spring should let you get away with less length than more because the same weight will compress it less distance.
 
21 - 40 of 1,200 Posts